I've just tried to ping 44.182.21.0 and lookup the address and nothing is returned in either case.  Is 44.182.21.0 registered?

73, Don


On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Marius Petrescu <marius@yo2loj.ro> wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Hi Lynwood,

-----Original Message-----
From: 44net-bounces+marius=yo2loj.ro@hamradio.ucsd.edu
[mailto:44net-bounces+marius=yo2loj.ro@hamradio.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of
lleachii@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 15:32
To: 44net@hamradio.ucsd.edu
Subject: Re: [44net] Gateways Unreachable after Dynamic IP Update
> The populated route reads:
>
>   44.182.21.0 via 89.122.215.236 dev tunl0 onlink  window 840
>
> 44.182.21.0 is a valid IP address on the ICANN Internet and does not
> imply a subnet in any form.
>
> It should contain a /24 notation as in the AMPRPortal:
>
>    44.182.21.0/24 via 89.122.215.236 dev tunl0 onlink window 840
>
> No AMPR networks on my routing table (populated by RIP44d) contain the
> proper CIDR notations.

This is what I see in the encap file:

route addprivate 44.182.20/24 encap 89.122.215.236
route addprivate 44.182.21/24 encap 89.122.215.236

Now these entries seem correct to me.
Does it work with the new version from Hessu?


Marius, YO2LOJ