Pretty much impossible since it is not subject to Part 97 at all.  Only the Gents agreements that it be used for Amateur use only.  Using it for something like HSMM-MESH is probably safe since it routes via callsign.  Not 100% but then any system is subject to abouse.

 

Ronny Julian

K4RJJ

 

 

---

From: "Brian Kantor" <Brian@ucsd.edu>
To: "AMPRNet working group" <44net@hamradio.ucsd.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 6:39:16 PM
Subject: Re: [44net] directly routed subnets

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:51:43PM +0100, Bjorn Pehrson wrote:
> Why don't you suggest the rules that you would like to see for discussion?

Wow. That's the problem, isn't it?  How to maintain the network for ham radio
use and not waste it.  I'd like to see it used for the public good - advancement
of technology, public service, that sort of thing.

I'd like to require that the netspace hams get is used
for ham radio, not sold, nonprofit, free, etc.  

What else would we require of "clients"?

        - Brian
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net