Ruben,
You just asked (or suggest) I be the only available recursive nameserver for AMPRNet. You must have missed I've begun that for 10+ years ago. Yet to the contrary - you seem to miss the issue of its need and others existence for years?
In cases where one does not add a gateway to use AMPRNet for Internet, how did users easily configure clients to use DNS for all of the domains/IP available over the AMPRNet (44.0/9-44.128.0/10 today) network/space/domain?
The DNS servers prevented the disjointed issued that caused failures prior to dns-mdc's existence - now, you're just asking me to use my internet for those clients, yet this solution was to prevent usages of AMPRGW for Internet. So be it. The late B. Kantor, SK and my Late Regional Coordinator Applauded this - my late coordinator even setup DNS too, understanding the issue.
As of the passing of N1URO, to my knowledge, I provided the first and not only client DNS server. So yes - I will just do it, but I humbly asked 44.15/16 spare me Internet when users connect to them - which might me useful in a emergency. They refused and that's OK.
I appreciate the response from Federick. Normal PTR requests are fine. Thank you for understanding the issue preventing better usage of the network - on the network.
73,
Lynwood
KB3VWG