While I can't speak for the company making the UDR56k and I have stated previously where I think it missed the mark. putting a new RF modem on an ethernet connection is a good thing. It's something kantronics should have done when the 9612 was introduced to the world. The advantage of placing it in ethernet is that one simply assigns it an address, plugs it into a (poe) hub, and it works with little to no config on the host side. many if not most who might be interested in this probably would rather not spend a huge amount of time futzing with the operating system of whatever device takes bits to or from RF. personally, I'd like to see routing functions completely divorced and separated from host services functions. if you wish to offer application layer services to amprnet then fine, put them up on a host of their own. that host should not generally also route. That just seems the be good practice. The reality is that these ethernet to RF boxen will likely intigrate into your subnet just fine and be more reliable than either serial or usb (never mind I fail to find an actual hardware serial port on ANY PC built in about the last 5 yrs....) The reality is that these don't need much in the way of computer onboard and likely never will. I don't see their intent as being something that is intended to host services and the computer needed to move bits from ethernet to 56k wireless modem should not add much cost, I'm guessing 15-20usd/unit while adding much utility.
Eric
AF6EP
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)I agree with you about not having the perfect locations for microwave
_______________________________________________
frequencies. We have some nice sites on mountains and some not-so-nice
sites with trees. So I was originally excited to read about the UDR56K.
*BUT* I, for one, am really disappointed that the UDR56K is also a linux
machine. I think they screwed the pooch on that (although I understand
about 300 pre-orders would disagree with me). Why do I say this? Because I
already have a linux machine running JNOS (and a bunch of other stuff). I
was excited about the prospect of switching our current backbone from 1200
to 56K. I was hoping to just plug it into another serial port on my
existing linux machine. But it has no serial ports for my other
TNCs/radios. (and adding multiple usb-serial adapters and a powered usb hub
is just trouble waiting to happen). And I'm betting it doesn't have the
horsepower that my existing linux system does, which runs an amprnet
gateway, mail gateway, lots of iptables rules, spam and virus checking,
etc., plus some automated network testing stuff. Whatever processor it does
have, will be aging along the processor aging curve (speed doubles every 18
months) and to upgrade, you would throw out the radio, too - a bit of the
baby and bathwater approach. In fact, forget about upgrades. If anything
fails -- radio, modem, linux system memory, linux system storage -- I've got
to replace the whole thing. All things fail at some point. So this just
seems strange to me.
I wish they had just made the radio/modem and provided a serial port so I
could connect it to whatever machine I want. I would have bought one for
each of our machines, plus a spare (7). But I don't know what to do with
what they built - namely a fast modem and radio hard-wired to a very
limited, non-expandable linux platform. But again, I guess I'm in the
minority because I understand they have about 300 pre-orders.
Oh well.
Michael
N6MEF
-----Original Message-----
We don't all have mountaintop microwave sites....
We have homes and ham stations in compromise locations with city lots,
restricted antennas and big RF absorbing trees... 25W of 440 MHz
will probably get through where less power at higher frequencies
won't. The UDR56K is a good compromise real world solution that is
probably the last best hope for AMPR data...
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
http://www.ampr.org/donate.html