Why would I or anyone else for that matter use anything that slow over wireless when multi megabit radios that will link reasonably long distances can be had for $50-100ea.  These radios connect via ethernet with no special software.  No I don&#39;t have any 56k radios on order, I don&#39;t see them as worth the cost to salvage from the trash bin next door.<br>

<br>Eric<br>AF6EP<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Bill Vodall <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:wa7nwp@gmail.com" target="_blank">wa7nwp@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex">

<div class="im">(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
</div><div class="im">&gt;&gt; Or maybe the odd one-in-a-million experimenter actually  might use 56k.<br>
<br>
</div>Doesn&#39;t everybody on this list have at least 2 of the new 56K data<br>
radios on order?<br>
<br>
  <a href="http://nwdigitalradio.com/?page_id=24" target="_blank">http://nwdigitalradio.com/?page_id=24</a><br>
<br>
Bill - WA7NWP<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_________________________________________<br>
44Net mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu">44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu</a><br>
<a href="http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net" target="_blank">http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>