_____________________________________________
> Hi Ralph,
>
> Just a few of questions?
> How are you going to control the content of the traffic to meet the
> Amateur Radio Rules and Regulations from the various countries on the
> Internet traffic to radio via your Internet Service Provider business?
> How are you going to preserve the AX.25a packets currently required
> under ITU rules?
> How are you going to work with those who are required to have a tunnel
> system?
> There are many countries that do not allow various content form or to
> the Internet by radio networks. There must be a control or gateway.
> This is not a US issue or community, It is a world group.
>
> Also, could you please add at least your call sign to your posts? I am
> not sure which Ralph is speaking.
>
> Jim Fuller
> N7VR --
http://www.n7vr.org
> International TCP/IP Gateways Robot Operator --
>
http://www.ampr-gateways.org
>
> MTAPRS NET Server Operator --
http://www.mtaprs.net
> CWOP-2 --
http://www.wxqa.com
> IRLP Node 3398 -
http://irlp.fuller.net Original ARECC contributor
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ralph [mailto:
ralphlists@bsrg.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 6:26 PM
> To: 'AMPRNet working group'
> Subject: Re: [44net] OpenVPN
>
> (Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
> _______________________________________________
> We don't want a tunnel.
> We want them sent through our Tier 1 upstream provider to our ISP,
> which I own and provide service to other Hams on.
> That is why we contacted you in the first place Brian.
>
> 44 Net is not just for tunneling
> Use the allocation or lose it, just like 220 (tm)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
>> the mention of using openvpn was mostly intended as a nudge. While
>> IPIP seems to be the defacto standard for amprnet tunneling, it's
>> about the only place I've seen it used much. The tools for
>> tunnels/vpn links are out there but something such as openvpn is much
>> more widely supported than ipip....
>
> As a historical note, we used IPIP tunnels because that's all there
> was when we got started. This was early; we were using tunnels even
> before a protocol ID byte value had been assigned to IPIP. VPNs
> hadn't been invented yet.
>
> Indeed, we've discussed using openvpn before and the response was
> generally favorable. It would be a great step forward for the
> tunneled parts of the network.
> - Brian
> te: 06/07/12
>
>
> _________________________________________
> 44Net mailing list
>
44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu
>
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
>
> _________________________________________
> 44Net mailing list
>
44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu
>
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net