It would seem Linux and Ethernet whatever architecture it's running on would seem to be the best solution available for routing Net44 at the moment and it works well. a standardized plug and play package of hardware sold by your local candy store would be nice but we're only partially there. Being that 44NET/Amprnet is supposed to be a RADIO BASED IP NETWORK (or at least interconnected islands of RADIO BASED IP NETWORK) we seem to only have half of a standardized solution to offer. It seems that we have forgotten the RADIO part. Given a live piece of cat5 with bits on it that I wish to have show up elsewhere what can we offer to the average ham that can go on the tower with Ethernet in one side and an antenna on the other, especially something standard enough that a local group can set up a network with? The only thing I can think of that even comes close is the professional grade 802.11 hardware that's out there. (much of the consumer stuff lacks the configurablity we could really use such as power control and timeouts). I might propose that we standardize the RF interface for AMPRNET on an agreed physical layer (of 802.11 unless something else is proposed and made quickly and cheaply available) and a relatively standard stack of hardware and software be put forth as a package that could be turnkey deployed by interested parties. What would others think of embarking upon such a project as a group? who might be interested? and what might we offer? (PS. I know of at least one manufacture of gear that would be quite happy to mod a standard product or products so as to have them better fit the amateur radio band plan and channels on a couple of our microwave bands as well as make provision for the ability to get significant QRO above the 25-30dbm out that seems standard. This in production batches maybe as low as lots of 100 units)
Eric
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Actually, Linux on x86 hardware is just as much of a "hardware-based"
solution as any proprietary OS on proprietary hardware is. In fact, Linux
on x86 easily outperforms most proprietary hardware solutions up to and
beyond the Cisco 7x00 range, especially with the current Intel architecture
systems. Vyatta (now part of Brocade) and others have proven that over and
over for the last several years.
I hope we can establish something that's vendor neutral, rather than any
type of single vendor lock-in.
Michael
N6MEF
----
In the performance class we are operating in, "hardware based" is not really
required.
A suitable box (processor and ethernet interfaces) and software (e.g. Linux
plus some usermode
tools) can do the same thing.
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
http://www.ampr.org/donate.html