Hi John,
Thanks for the slides, Is there a video of the presentation available
anywhere I think it'd make some good viewing.
Rebooting the AMPRnet is whats needed, new products like the UDR56k are
a great idea and I'd expect to see some poor mans clones of its
functionality following in time. Thanks to the internet the general
level of data comms knowledge has improved in the last 20 years, and a
resurgence in interest seems to be occurring. Me personally, I've got
internet burnout. :)
As regards to tunnelling, I thought it was policy that to tunnel to /44
you need a static IP I read somewhere. Technically of course it's
possible to tunnel to any accessable IP, I subscribe to a dynamic DNS
service to track my VPN end points for example.
-Cheers Max. G7UOZ.
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 12:00 -0700, 44net-request(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
wrote:
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 14:41:22 -0700
> From: K7VE - John <k7ve(a)k7ve.org>
> To: AMPRNet working group <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
> Subject: Re: [44net] Some newbie guidance.
> Message-ID:
> <CAN77r3xdL9DQv3XFH331PQ+YdBa2MaTu6PBnWq1ehCrvYcdYuA(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Slides from a presentation I gave a couple of months ago
> http://www.microhams.com/digitalconf2012/K7VE_N7IPB_RebootNET44.pdf
>
> Some of the tunneling protocols don't require a fixed IP -- I tunnel a /24
> network from a data center to my home (and also a portable subnet) using
> L2TP.
>
> ------------------------------
> John D. Hays
> K7VE
> PO Box 1223, Edmonds, WA 98020-1223
> <http://k7ve.org/blog> <http://twitter.com/#!/john_hays>
> <http://www.facebook.com/john.d.hays>
