44net July 2021

44net@mailman.ampr.org

42 participants
17 discussions

Scenario: DE HAMNET user accessing NL user's web service
by Janko Mivšek 30 Jul '21

30 Jul '21

Hello everyone, To be more concrete and to better understand issues behind the TAC proposal, I draw a scheme for fictional scenario where German user with non-public 44 IP wants to access via HAMNET a Dutch user's web service, running on his computer with public 44 IP: http://ftp.eranova.si/44net/scenario-de-nl-s57nk-jul21.png Both have 44 IPs in 44.128/16 range covered in TAC proposal. HAMNET is a closed network, non accessible from Internet while Dutch 44net is completely open to public access. Two extreme cases therefore. German user has set a simple static route: all traffic to 44.128/10 should go via HAMNET while all the rest via NAT to internet. NAT is needed because his local 44 IP is from a HAMNET's subnet which is not announced all over the Internet via BGP. Contrary to Dutch user, which local 44 IP is from BGP announced subnet and therefore everyone from Internet can access his web server. Also, he can access anything on the public Internet without any NAT needed. Furthermore, he is proudly represented on the Internet as radio amateur because of his 44 IP. Now to the scenario: German user finds his Dutch college website interesting and he'd like to access it. But his 44.128/10 static route will direct him over the HAMNET, not to public Internet. No access possible until HAMNET is connected directly to Dutch 44net. Now suppose we connect both those nets too. Dutch web server will now respond to German college's web request and response will be hopefully routed back to him. Hopefully the requests from public internet will also be served as before. Am I correct with this scenario? Are there any routing issues, are they already solved? Or how to solve them? If this scenario doable, are there some more issues? Best 73 Janko S57NK

1 0

Is 44.159.159.0/24 allocated?
by Soha Jin 30 Jul '21

30 Jul '21

Hi there, I found an organization called SSL Corporation (AS38281) start announcing 44.159.159.0/24 since 2021-07-29 14:08:00. I found it here: https://radar.qrator.net/search?query=44.159.159.0%2F24 It is strange with that a renumber plan which says 44.128/10 will be used for radio only was just came out several days ago. I tried to find it on portal, but there is not such a prefix. I also tried to look it up with whois, but it reports a database error: $ whois -h whois.ampr.org 44.159.159.0 # # ARDC WHOIS data and services are subject to the Terms of Use # available at: http://www.ampr.org # # If you see inaccuracies in the results, please report them at # https://portal.ampr.org/contact-us.php # Database error# # ARDC WHOIS data and services are subject to the Terms of Use # available at: http://www.ampr.org # # If you see inaccuracies in the results, please report them at # https://portal.ampr.org/contact-us.php # This prefix is announced with a route object: route: 44.159.159.0/24 origin: AS38281 descr: Assigned by AMPRNET for radio experiment usage. admin-c: Charles Wang tech-c: Charles Wang mnt-by: MAINT-AS38281 changed: charleswang(a)nekollc.com 20210729 #13:20:12Z source: RADB I am here to ask if this announcement authorized? 73, Soha Jin

2 2

Re: [44net] A new era of IPv4 Allocations
by Pedro Converso 29 Jul '21

29 Jul '21

Will proposed change affect 44.153.x.x allocations? Thanks 73, lu7abf, Pedro 44.153 Argentina Coordination

11 17

Re: [44net] Future of AMPRNet Should NOT BE AMPRNet
by Antonios Chariton (daknob) 28 Jul '21

28 Jul '21

Hello Ian! Speaking as the TAC again, RPKI ROAs and route(6) objects are also something we worked on. It’s going to be proposed later, definitely after the summer, and will hopefully help many users and make Internet routing more secure for everyone! Thanks, Antonis > On 28 Jul 2021, at 23:03, Ian Chilton <ian(a)chilton.me.uk> wrote: > > Hi, > > Totally agree with all of the points about IPv6! > > On a related note…. > > I’m sure this has been discussed many times over, but with so many announcing 44 space with BGP, I think going forward it’s important to be able > to create RPKI ROAs (and IRRDB objects) for the space. > > Thanks, > > Ian

2 1

Problems with gw.ampr.org
by G1FEF 25 Jul '21

25 Jul '21

Hello 44Net, Just to advise that there is likely to be heavy packet loss through the gateway server at UCSD currently. The 1G link has been fully saturated since just before midnight PST (see attached MRTG graph). I can’t even login to the server reliably enough to see what the traffic is but I guess some DDOS is ongoing. I will keep you informed as and when I have further information. 73, Chris - G1FEF

2 2

Introducing Dan Romanchik - KB6NU - our new Content Manager
by Rosy Wolfe 07 Jul '21

07 Jul '21

Hello 44net! Given that he just posted info for the next community meeting, this is an excellent opportunity to welcome a new employee - Dan Romanchik, KB6NU, who is our new Content Manager. He'll be helping us with all things related to writing - newsletters, web content, and even helping with grantee proposals. Here's a little bit about Dan: Dan, KB6NU, has been a radio geek ever since he turned on his grandparents' Philco console radio about age 10. He got his first license at age 16, then obtained a BSEE degree from the University of Detroit. After working as a test engineer for a dozen years or so, he decided to direct his engineering talents in another direction and became a technical editor for Test&Measurement World magazine, a post he held for six years. After leaving the magazine, Dan was self-employed as a website developer and freelance writer. He blogs about amateur radio at KB6NU.Com and self-publishes the "No Nonsense" line of amateur radio license study guides. He's also self published *21 Things to Do After You Get Your Amateur Radio License" and *The CWGeek's Guide to Having Fun with Morse Code." He feels his biggest accomplishement has been helping thousands of people get their first amateur radio license or upgrade to General and Extra, either by reading his study guides or by attending the classes he teaches. He's very excited to now be working with ARDC and hopes that his work here will help even more people have fun with amateur radio. Please join me in welcoming him! 73, Rosy -- Rosy Wolfe - KJ7RYV Executive Director Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC) ampr.org

4 3

Community Meeting: July 24, 2021, 1700 UTC
by Dan Romanchik KB6NU 06 Jul '21

06 Jul '21

We’re midway through 2021, and it’s time for the next ARDC Community Meeting! It will take place on: Saturday, 24 July 2021 1700 UTC (10am PT / 1pm ET / 7pm CET) In this meeting, we’ll cover: Grants made to date in 2021, including our first grant made outside the U.S. to DARC. Introductions of two new staff members: Grants Manager – Chelsea Parraga, KF0FVJ Content Manager – Dan Romanchik, KB6NU Questions from our attendees. The meeting will be held on Zoom. Info on how to join is below. This meeting is open to all interested parties, so please tell your friends! See you on July 24! // Zoom Info ARDC is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting. Topic: July 24 Community Meeting Time: Jul 24, 2021 10:00 AM Pacific Time (US and Canada) Join Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86944554944?pwd=ZjlFdk5aUGgydGFCSnluenNzbm9SUT09 Meeting ID: 869 4455 4944 Passcode: 44net One tap mobile +16699006833,,86944554944#,,,,738141# US (San Jose) +12532158782,,86944554944#,,,,738141# US (Tacoma) Dial by your location +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma) +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston) +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago) +1 929 205 6099 US (New York) +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC) Meeting ID: 869 4455 4944 Passcode: 738141 Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kc7yFYiowZ

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

44net July 2021