Oh, I am on ROS7/CHR. Is there a way to get it work on ROS7?
Kun
________________________________
From: Marius Petrescu via 44net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2023 9:18
To: 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
Subject: [44net] Re: IPIP tunnel for Mikrotik
The v3.1 scripts are for ROS up to 6.40, and the v3.2 scripts from ROS 6.41 up to the latest v6 releases.
The scripts do NOT work on ROS 7 due to the fact that the RIP handling changed and the RIP timers do not work correctly.
Marius, YO2LOJ
On 18/09/2023 18:01, KUN LIN via 44net wrote:
Hi
Has anyone setup the IPIP tunnel successfully in Mikrotik? I think the instruction in Wiki is written for ROS 2.0. Things has changed a lot and I have trouble following. I created the IPIP tunnel in the interface and not sure what to do next. I added my IP subnet to the IP tab. The RIP configuration menu is very different now.
Kun
_______________________________________________
44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org<mailto:44net@mailman.ampr.org>
To unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org<mailto:44net-leave@mailman.ampr.org>
Hello, 44Net!
Last spring, ARDC put out a survey about whether we should adopt a Code
of Conduct. The vast majority (~75%) of you Agreed or Strongly Agreed
that we should. I’m pleased to share that, after many drafts, the day
has finally come!
https://www.ardc.net/about/legal/code-of-conduct/
Please give it a read, as it applies to all ARDC-hosted spaces and
projects, including this mailing list. We’d love to hear your thoughts
and questions. Feel free to respond to this thread for an open
discussion, or email conduct(a)ardc.net for thoughts you’d rather keep
private. If you are interested in having a public Q+A over Zoom, please
let us know and we’ll set one up.
As noted in one of the first paragraphs, we see this as a living
document and expect patches over time. If you have feedback or
suggestions, please send it to the email address above. Please also be
patient with us and our replies – we are working with a new committee
and will be building the plane as we fly it. The current committee
members are noted in the document.
Thanks for taking the time to review the Code of Conduct. We’re looking
forward to continuing to growing the ARDC community, with this new Code
as a solidifying block in our foundation.
73,
Rosy
--
Rosy Schechter - KJ7RYV
Executive Director
Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC)
ardc.net
Hi all,
I’ve been trying off and on over the last few days to set up a VPN connection to amprnet to use my new allocation.
I’m not succeeding on multiple linux machines and a macOS device and seeing a couple of the same errors -
OpenSSL: error:0B080074:x509 certificate routines:X509_check_private_key:key values mismatch
Cannot load private key file /etc/openvpn/client.key
Error: private key password verification failed
The first is related to, I assume, my user certificate - is this a fatal error and am I doing something wrong, has the advice changed from `cat certs/user certs/authorities > client.crt`?
Secondly, the password verification is confusing me - I have just imported a new tqsl cert generated this week, and in tqsl it advises me there’s no certificate passphrase. I’m not sure what to do here - if I try and export a .p12 from tqsl, and generate keys from that, I am asked for a password too and that ends in no progress.
I see the same errors in tunnelblick on MacOS.
Is there any reason I’m being asked for a password? My current LoTW password doesn’t resolve this. My concern is that there is some password I’m missing from when the certificate was first generated years ago and that now prevents me from accessing the VPN.
Cheers & 73
Hibby MM0RFN.
Hello,
Since there is no automated way to request a /24 allocation, I submitted a message to AMPRNET on the portal a few weeks ago and have received no response. Is there someone that handles these that I could contact?
73,
-Sam, KF0ACN
Chris, if I need to contact someone else, please let me know.
I'm needing to update some DNS entries for my subnet.
44.46.15.1 gateway.nr0q.ampr.org
44.46.15.2 airsupply.nr0q.ampr.org
44.46.15.3 eagle.nr0q.ampr.org
44.46.15.4 traffic1.nr0q.ampr.org
44.46.15.5 traffic2.nr0q.ampr.org
44.46.15.6 floyd.nr0q.ampr.org
44.46.15.10 oams.nr0q.ampr.org
44.46.15.194 one.nr0q.ampr.org
44.46.15.195 two.nr0q.ampr.org
Thanks
Matthew NR0Q
--
The content of this email is confidential and intended for the
recipient
specified in message only. It is strictly forbidden to share
any part of
this message with any third party, without a written consent
of the
sender. If you received this message by mistake, please reply to
this
message and follow with its deletion, so that we can ensure such a
mistake
does not occur in the future.
Please do not print this email unless it is
necessary. Every unprinted email helps the environment.
Hello everyone,
A quick question, what is the best solution, if possible, to have reverse DNS on a /24 announced in BGP?
Thank you friends !
--
Gary
F4HIN
Hello all, I’m sorry for contacting the main list, but I’m trying to reach Chris Smith, but I think my direct messages to him are going to spam.
Chris: YES. I would like to continue using the 44.4.57.0/24 BGP allocation. Please help me start the renewal process. I tried contacting you back in August to start the process, but I heard nothing back.
-Jeremy
To whom it may concern.
Greetings.
In my server logs every single hour I see the following entries:
Oct 4 05:21:31 linux conversd[1881152]: info (link Hub_EU): Catham_UK
detected loop with Mitchell: DEST Attica_GR. DEST already via Attica_GR
Oct 4 06:21:34 linux conversd[1881152]: info (link Hub_EU): Catham_UK
detected loop with Mitchell: DEST Attica_GR. DEST already via Attica_GR
Oct 4 07:21:38 linux conversd[1881152]: info (link Hub_EU): Catham_UK
detected loop with Mitchell: DEST Attica_GR. DEST already via Attica_GR
Oct 4 08:21:41 linux conversd[1881152]: info (link Hub_EU): Catham_UK
detected loop with Mitchell: DEST Attica_GR. DEST already via Attica_GR
This situation is going continuously more than a month.
Something, somewhere seem to be definitely misconfigured.
Possibly owner of offending convers server
can take appropriate action to fix this, please?
Best regards.
--
Tom - SP2L
https://www.sp2l.ampr.org
------------------------------------
It is nice to be important.
But it is more important to be nice!
Nobody is mistaken - so do I.
I've just powered on a Mikrotik hAP lite which I believe I had
recently correctly configured, i.e. traffic between the internet and my
44net subnet was flowing on its ether2-4 ports, however appears to now be
dropping incoming traffic to my subnet with Destination Unreachable ICMP
frames. I have checked and re-checked my config steps from scratch with no
success.
Would someone with an IPIP-connected 44net allocation, a working Mikrotik
setup, and 5 minutes of spare time mind please running "/export
hide-sensitive" on their Mikrotik and sending me the output so I can diff
it, to find my inevitably stupid error?
Thanks.