> Of 688 entries in the ENCAP.TXT table there are 130 that are /32 single
> IP host. That's about 19% of all routes that ONLY reach ONE host and do
> NOT serve a subnet or provide gateway services for anyone else.
> I too wonder why these single host routes are allowed????
I don't see anything wrong with that, this is just a single host on the tunnel network.
What I am wondering about is the gateways that do not have anything routed to them at all.
Look in the portal and view in subnet mode, there are many gateways that show nothing there.
Rob
Can anyone reach the UBNT.COM web site from AMPRNET ?
The site give me timeout
Of course its accessible from non ANPRNet address
Thanks Forward
Ronen - 4Z4ZQ
Hello all,
If anyone is familiar with public software development, I need to get
the Linux AX.25 software suite added to OpenWRT.
I've successfully generated a makefile and /patches that will compile
the current libax25, but have issues with compiling ax25-tools (which
needs libax25; but I'm having trouble building individual packages with
dependencies in other locations). I haven't tried ax25-apps.
OpenWRT already posses kmod-ax25.
http://www.linux-ax25.org
Very basic for someone who knows. Please contact me.
73,
- Lynwood
KB3VWG
Hey all,
We're still working in the Washington, DC area on our HSMM Mesh network.
At this point, I've been solving an issue when - those who have gateways
and routes to AMPR will properly route. The only solution thus far is -
those in the area with direct interconnections to AMPR as well as the
Internet, will have to route them (lol). This requires announcing
specific routes on the network. Mesh uses OLSR.
My plan:
- I'll make an Ethernet interface that is on the Mesh, we plan to get an
allocation from AMPRNet (soon) for this
- I'll run OLSR on this interface
The script:
- The current dynamic firewall script that now runs (see Wiki), will
take the 44 networks and announce them in HNA
I need assistance with developing that new portion of the script. I'm
currently working on setting up a test to an adjacent HSMM node.
Why can't the Mesh speak RIP44?
- It will, we plan to setup another service with public keys that will
change our DDNS name to the main router, it will start an election for
if an Operator looses a good route via their Internet to AMPRGW.
- While we plan to run the Mesh's tunnel with BGP eventually, the
network will be configured to assume that the route to 0.0.0.0/0 is
general on OLSR, and there are multiple gateways, others authorized to
announce the Internet will use more specific routes like 0.0.0.0/1 and
128.0.0.0/1...etc...the main router will announce the Internet to the
mesh by 255 /8 networks.
- This network will be hybrid, unless you connection track the packet,
it can return any direction
- Masquerade when necessary, lol
73,
- Lynwood
KB3VWG
Hello,
I am wondering if there is a way we can take over as the coordinator for the 44.103/16 Michigan2 Block. Currently all the allocations in this /16 are to our microwave projects here in Michigan and it seems there is an issue with requesting a /24 that will be BGP announced from a separate location then our current allocations.
I made a request on 2018-02-07 the coordinator requested I submit a utilization for one of our /19’s. We currently have a /19 /21 /23 /24 in our project now but I responded with the /19’s utilization report as requested. On 2018-02-14 the coordinator responded with : Fred, Your request will be ready RSN (Real Soon Now) I said thanks. On 2018-03-01 I asked for a status update. 2018-03-03 the coordinator responded: I expect next week. That week has now come and gone with no response or allocation.
If a coordinator can not be changed out we would be willing to re-ip into a new /16 block that we can issue requests for IP’s in a more timely matter like our HamWAN brothers do out in the western US area.
--
Fredric Moses - W8FSM - WQOG498
fred(a)moses.bz
Hi, to all concerned,
found the following errors by making the 'source' of the
actual 'encap.txt' file.
Can't add route to 44.24.172.40/29 via encap 44.24.172.41
Can't add route to 44.130.104/24 via encap 44.130.104.1
Can't add route to 44.130.105/24 via encap 44.130.105.1
Can't add route to 44.130.106/24 via encap 44.130.106.1
Can't add route to 44.130.107/24 via encap 44.130.107.1
Can't add route to 44.131.14.252/31 via encap 44.131.14.253
Can't add route to 44.136.150/23 via encap 44.136.150.2
--
73 and ciao, gus i0ojj/ir0aab
> At minimum, just a USB sound card ($5 US) and some way to key up your
> radio. The Direwolf UserGuide details all this for you. On a Raspberry
> Pi, a simple transistor circuit and a GPIO pin off the Pi is all you need.
For software guys, it is now possible to make receive-only installations with even
less hardware.
On our co-channel diversity repeater system we have sites where an RTL DVB-T stick
is used with SVXlink "remotetrx" configured to provide a number of virtual NBFM
receivers where some of them are connected to the SVXlink master site to receive
voice to be transmitted over the repeater, and other virtual receivers are connected
via a loopback audio device to a direwolf process used to gateway the received APRS
packets to the aprs2.net
As the APRS frequency on 70cm is in the process of being changed, we receive on both
the old and new frequency and also on 2 different repeater input frequencies, all
with a single stick (and a bandpass in front of it, of course).
I have even tested an SSB input to the repeater, which worked fine too. It is possible
to add receivers and connect them to some application without touching the soldering
iron, without even going to the site.
It is really wonderful what software can do today...
Rob
Has anyone know of any TNC model that stick on Raspberry Pi and support 9600 Baud ?
The TNC pi2 does not support 9600 according to the seller
Please advice
Thanks Forward
Ronen - 4Z4ZQ
http://www.ronen.org
Ronen Pinchooks (4Z4ZQ) WebSite<http://www.ronen.org/>
www.ronen.orgronen.org (Ronen Pinchooks (4Z4ZQ) WebSite) is hosted by domainavenue.com
This radio will be field tested soon at an area school. I look
forward to hearing more and will report back when I do:
http://www.metricsystems.com/
I figured I'd point it out to the list enough though I suspect the
price point is not for the typical radio amateur.
It would seem a company making such a thing would have a limited
market, so if it could be unlocked to cover ham freq's that might
provide a small secondary market.
Either way, hams looking to move data might also want to research
white space radios as I suspect this sort of thing will be more
common.
PS:
I see the dunderheads in Newington have proposed some changes to the
hobby. Sadly anything to do with data/bandwidth isn't part of it.
