44net

44net@mailman.ampr.org

3198 discussions

Tester requested.
by Jean Létourneau 15 Dec '13

15 Dec '13

Good day all, I am wondering if my setup is fully operational, can you guy's take 2 minute of your time and try to ping the following adddresses from your ampr.org network and reporte them back to me: 44.135.49.1, 44.135.49.2 and 44.135.49.4 thank you! 73 de Jean, -- Sysop de: VE2PKT (BBS), VE2PKT-3 (URONode),VE2PKT-4, VE2RAJ (XRouter) : VE2RCN-1, VE2RDL-1, VE2RGC-1, VE2RVA-1, (The-Net) : VE2PKT-9 (DXCluster), VE2PKT-10 (Winlink Gateway) RF: 147.435 Mhz (1200 Bps) Internet: Telnet xrouter-ve2pkt.dyndns.org port 23 (Network Node) Telnet fbb-ve2pkt.dyndns.org port 6300 (FBB BBS) Telnet ve2pkt.dyndns.org port 9000 (DXCluster) E-Mail: packet: ve2pkt(a)ve2pkt.#qbc.qc.can.noam ampr net: ve2pkt(a)ve2pkt.ampr.org Inet: ve2pkt(a)amsat.org or ve2pkt(a)gmail.com

15 31

unclaimed gateways
by Brian Kantor 15 Dec '13

15 Dec '13

According to records on the portal, the following 120 (of 275 total) entries in the gateways list are unclaimed - that is, no one has come forward to take ownership of the entry. They therefore appear to be inactive. I propose we mark these as no longer in service. That will have the effect of no longer including them in the encap list. Eventually we'll delete them from the database if they're not reactivated. If a gateway that is still valid is listed below, contact me or Chris to get it assigned to the proper registered owner. - Brian 8.22.205.37 12.195.50.128 24.55.199.25 24.84.205.232 24.89.203.65 24.137.76.29 24.212.252.100 24.212.252.109 24.212.252.110 24.224.157.206 50.79.209.150 62.49.17.234 64.22.214.233 64.119.33.202 64.119.42.138 64.255.99.17 65.41.209.137 65.48.61.133 65.70.212.35 66.11.68.11 66.112.51.126 66.114.139.158 67.108.91.190 68.61.222.68 68.188.234.106 68.209.144.3 69.69.168.201 69.137.244.193 69.145.172.163 69.178.117.150 69.254.106.173 70.137.68.217 71.36.92.66 71.107.40.238 71.107.40.238 71.201.92.148 74.85.194.5 75.21.234.175 76.14.161.185 76.64.80.228 76.247.140.206 76.253.114.92 77.249.108.97 79.116.75.255 79.116.81.105 80.59.234.233 80.229.68.173 81.235.253.122 84.92.153.154 89.228.59.72 90.206.95.108 91.84.215.75 94.72.251.181 94.101.48.134 94.172.232.113 96.20.43.106 96.35.76.41 97.84.11.198 98.193.215.29 98.208.81.22 99.88.77.66 99.116.194.13 108.185.66.208 113.212.169.28 118.22.1.194 118.82.200.153 122.108.78.111 130.208.168.63 131.155.192.172 141.85.43.57 142.103.194.1 146.48.126.26 146.48.126.28 148.223.34.6 150.188.8.195 152.66.0.109 155.207.19.57 158.42.128.200 161.53.16.179 168.96.128.17 173.14.57.181 173.177.124.119 173.208.214.53 184.175.46.166 186.125.37.47 189.42.190.50 190.31.163.55 190.139.56.180 192.147.172.252 193.22.2.254 194.27.119.2 195.22.112.28 195.113.115.135 195.150.236.251 198.108.247.220 200.17.207.2 200.46.129.3 201.252.37.40 202.63.57.97 203.5.58.162 203.24.120.198 203.24.120.199 203.24.120.200 203.26.188.134 203.59.134.49 206.251.38.99 207.111.203.194 207.179.123.166 208.74.106.137 208.94.114.29 208.115.126.75 208.127.104.172 212.159.74.68 212.159.90.90 213.73.1.100 216.86.85.144 216.144.222.182 217.42.40.69 220.157.89.84 220.233.86.207

17 31

Re: [44net] rip routes - how often?
by kb9mwr＠gmail.com 15 Dec '13

15 Dec '13

Its working now. But it took much longer than 5 mins to get the inital transmission. After that it appears to be every 5 min. The same thing I observed last time I set a gateway up. Oh well, just need to learn patience. Thanks

2 1

rip routes - how often?
by kb9mwr＠gmail.com 15 Dec '13

15 Dec '13

How often are the rip routes transmitted? I have read every 5 mins, but ever time I initially set up a gateway it always seems to take a *lot* longer than that to see anything come thru. https://raw.github.com/hessu/rip44d/master/rip44d I have DMZ on my DD-WRT home router pointed to the pc running the rip daemon, 192.168.1.106 My gateway entry is: 174.103.204.106 ifconfig tunl0 up 44.92.21.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 tunl0 Link encap:IPIP Tunnel HWaddr inet addr:44.92.21.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 UP RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:0 Metric:1 RX packets:1 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:152 (152.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B) root@test:~# ./rip44d -v found local address: 192.168.1.106 found local address: 127.0.0.1 found local address: 44.92.21.1 opening UDP socket 520... entering main loop, waiting for RIPv2 datagrams Also watching with tcpdump. Perhaps someone could create a tool to verify protocol 4 packets are reaching the daemon? I always though that might be handy... go to a webpage enter your outside address and it sends a protocol 4 packet... or something?

2 1

Gateway Management
by Brian Rogers 14 Dec '13

14 Dec '13

Greetings; <$0.02> As Jay mentioned, we had the email robot before... perhaps it may be wise to run such again parallel to the portal while the issues Chris mentioned are worked out? This is standard practices almost anywhere in which a production environment is being modified/upgraded/replaced. </$0.02> -- 73 de Brian Rogers - N1URO email: <n1uro(a)n1uro.ampr.org> Web: http://www.n1uro.net/ Ampr1: http://n1uro.ampr.org/ Ampr2: http://nos.n1uro.ampr.org Linux Amateur Radio Services axMail-Fax & URONode AmprNet coordinator for: Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

3 5

Re: [44net] unclaimed gateways
by VK4AA | VK4TTT Sam 14 Dec '13

14 Dec '13

----- Original Message ----- From: "VK4AA | VK4TTT Sam" <vk4ttt(a)ampr.org.au> To: "AMPRNet working group" <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu> Cc: <danny(a)ddmcomputers.com> Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 12:49 AM Subject: Re: [44net] unclaimed gateways > Hi Brian > > These are current > VK7HDM (should be on bgp but Danny is yet to fix it up at his end) > 203.24.120.198 > 203.24.120.199 > 203.24.120.200 > > This is for a range waiting for BGP approval (it has slipped by for our > shared DSTAR|APRS|PAKET Site) > 203.26.188.134 > > > Sam > VK4AA > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Brian Kantor" <Brian(a)ucsd.edu> > To: <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu> > Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2013 8:24 AM > Subject: [44net] unclaimed gateways > > >> (Please trim inclusions from previous messages) >> _______________________________________________ >> According to records on the portal, the following 120 (of 275 total) >> entries in the gateways list are unclaimed - that is, no one has come >> forward to take ownership of the entry. They therefore appear to be >> inactive. >> >> I propose we mark these as no longer in service. That will have the >> effect of no longer including them in the encap list. Eventually >> we'll delete them from the database if they're not reactivated. >> >> If a gateway that is still valid is listed below, contact me or Chris >> to get it assigned to the proper registered owner. >> - Brian >> >> >> 8.22.205.37 >> 12.195.50.128 >> 24.55.199.25 >> 24.84.205.232 >> 24.89.203.65 >> 24.137.76.29 >> 24.212.252.100 >> 24.212.252.109 >> 24.212.252.110 >> 24.224.157.206 >> 50.79.209.150 >> 62.49.17.234 >> 64.22.214.233 >> 64.119.33.202 >> 64.119.42.138 >> 64.255.99.17 >> 65.41.209.137 >> 65.48.61.133 >> 65.70.212.35 >> 66.11.68.11 >> 66.112.51.126 >> 66.114.139.158 >> 67.108.91.190 >> 68.61.222.68 >> 68.188.234.106 >> 68.209.144.3 >> 69.69.168.201 >> 69.137.244.193 >> 69.145.172.163 >> 69.178.117.150 >> 69.254.106.173 >> 70.137.68.217 >> 71.36.92.66 >> 71.107.40.238 >> 71.107.40.238 >> 71.201.92.148 >> 74.85.194.5 >> 75.21.234.175 >> 76.14.161.185 >> 76.64.80.228 >> 76.247.140.206 >> 76.253.114.92 >> 77.249.108.97 >> 79.116.75.255 >> 79.116.81.105 >> 80.59.234.233 >> 80.229.68.173 >> 81.235.253.122 >> 84.92.153.154 >> 89.228.59.72 >> 90.206.95.108 >> 91.84.215.75 >> 94.72.251.181 >> 94.101.48.134 >> 94.172.232.113 >> 96.20.43.106 >> 96.35.76.41 >> 97.84.11.198 >> 98.193.215.29 >> 98.208.81.22 >> 99.88.77.66 >> 99.116.194.13 >> 108.185.66.208 >> 113.212.169.28 >> 118.22.1.194 >> 118.82.200.153 >> 122.108.78.111 >> 130.208.168.63 >> 131.155.192.172 >> 141.85.43.57 >> 142.103.194.1 >> 146.48.126.26 >> 146.48.126.28 >> 148.223.34.6 >> 150.188.8.195 >> 152.66.0.109 >> 155.207.19.57 >> 158.42.128.200 >> 161.53.16.179 >> 168.96.128.17 >> 173.14.57.181 >> 173.177.124.119 >> 173.208.214.53 >> 184.175.46.166 >> 186.125.37.47 >> 189.42.190.50 >> 190.31.163.55 >> 190.139.56.180 >> 192.147.172.252 >> 193.22.2.254 >> 194.27.119.2 >> 195.22.112.28 >> 195.113.115.135 >> 195.150.236.251 >> 198.108.247.220 >> 200.17.207.2 >> 200.46.129.3 >> 201.252.37.40 >> 202.63.57.97 >> 203.5.58.162 >> 203.24.120.198 >> 203.24.120.199 >> 203.24.120.200 >> 203.26.188.134 >> 203.59.134.49 >> 206.251.38.99 >> 207.111.203.194 >> 207.179.123.166 >> 208.74.106.137 >> 208.94.114.29 >> 208.115.126.75 >> 208.127.104.172 >> 212.159.74.68 >> 212.159.90.90 >> 213.73.1.100 >> 216.86.85.144 >> 216.144.222.182 >> 217.42.40.69 >> 220.157.89.84 >> 220.233.86.207 >> _________________________________________ >> 44Net mailing list >> 44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu >> http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net > --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com

2 1

OLSR over net 44?
by kb9mwr＠gmail.com 13 Dec '13

13 Dec '13

ON1ARF wrote: > True. Now, one thing I had in the back of my mind is that OLSR can actually > run over any interface. > > OLSR Is usually done over ad-hoc wifi interface, but you can run it over > -say- an ethernet link between two nodes ..; or -why not- a VPN tunnel. > > So, in the end, even if there is no direct radio-contact with other nodes, > you could -sort of- "fake" it by connecting nodes over the internet. It > would probably only require to set up a (say) OpenVPN server in some > datacenter. I never thought of this. Very interesting. I may have found a winter project to try. Perhaps I can find some folks on the ampr net 44 list to try this with?

4 4

Re: [44net] Raspberry Pi - FM transmitter
by Rob Janssen 12 Dec '13

12 Dec '13

> Subject: > Re: [44net] Raspberry Pi - FM transmitter > From: > David Ranch <amprgw(a)trinnet.net> > Date: > 12/11/2013 04:49 AM > > To: > AMPRNet working group <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu> > > > > Hello Tom, > > One of my elmers tried setting something similar up for WSPR but even with adding the various filters, the harmonics on the higher frequencies were very significant and went well out of the HAM bands! Well, the article says that the harmonics must be 43dB down to meet FCC regulations, or maybe 40dB when reading the complicated if-then-else-if sentences in those paragraphs (why not use a table?). That is quite harsh, for a 10mW transmitter. 1uW is not a lot of power. A homeplug device probably transmits a lot more than that. Rob

2 1

Raspberry Pi - FM transmitter
by sp2lob＠tlen.pl 10 Dec '13

10 Dec '13

Hello all, It’s a bit off topic, but worth to mention. I read article from link below with growing amaze... http://www.icrobotics.co.uk/wiki/index.php/Turning_the_Raspberry_Pi_Into_an… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekcdAX53-S8 Such small piece of hardware and such broad flexibility! What next? Low power APRS beacon? Or full-blown SDR radio? Best regards. Tom – sp2lob

2 1

network size estimates
by Michael E. Fox - N6MEF 08 Dec '13

08 Dec '13

I'm working on a presentation about packet networking. Does anyone have a reasonable estimate of: -- The number of BBS Systems reachable via AMPRnet -- The number of BBS Systems reachable via non-AMPRnet BBS forwarding network -- The number of BBS systems connected via both networks Note: This is not an attempt to compare the two. We're connected both ways. AND, I realize that other BBSs also connect to both, so there will be duplication. That's o.k. I'd just like to be able to give people a sense of how big (or small) each of the networks still is. If you have an estimate for any of the above numbers, can you tell me what it is and how you arrived at it? Thanks, Michael N6MEF

7 7

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

44net