44net

44net@mailman.ampr.org

3194 discussions

ASN # and Network Service Provider (NSP)
by Angelo 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

Hi Guys, I am trying to locate two pieces of information to be able to complete my BGP request. This seems to be more of a challenge then I though it would be. Is there a reference page or wiki that I can provide to my ISP to be able to locate this information. We have been dealing with these two questions for over 2 weeks. I am not sure if the ISP or the NSP know exactly what we are looking. From what I understand the ASN is just a number. No letters involved in this number. Is this true??? Any help in providing information to the NSP would help. Break Down - I will be connecting to ISP via VPN connection. The ISP connects to his feed in Houston via I ATT fiber connect to his NSP in Houston. The ISP sell service to clients in his area. He has a /6 himself. Please don't laugh. I am trying to lay this out the best I can. Any help would be appreciated. 73 de Angelo / N5UXT

21 63

Question about setting up 44net connection on BPQ
by CJ Kelley 20 Feb '21

20 Feb '21

Hi Everyone, I am trying to set up a BPQ node for access over the 44net and I have been running into trouble getting the connection working. I am running into an issue where I am not able to ping any 44 nodes. I can ping the local 44net interface, but can't ping past that. The host is in a DMZ, so it should be receiving the rip44 table. Even though the IPs are internal, I scrubbed them. What am I missing here? I am not able to ping any 44net nodes. I pulled 44.44.6.33 for sample: ping 44.44.6.33 PBSNOD:W7PBS-7} OK My arp table: arp PBSNOD:W7PBS-7} x.x.x.191 70:2a:d5:4a:29:9d 255 E 2770 The portion of bpq32.cfg for configuring the 44net connection. Port 1 is AXIP and Port 3 is the telnet port. IPGATEWAY Adapter \Device\NPF_{64EA23A4-79E1-4342-83E5-E92D65C2CA3D} 44ENCAP x.x.x.147 # Enable AMPRNET Tunnels and RIP44. I used 148 as the Tunnel Enpoint IPAddr 44.124.1.17 #This is the first IP in your AMPRnet allocation. IPNetmask 255.255.255.248 #AMPRnet netmask (Why is this 248 ? This is for your AMPRnet subnet. Your AMPRnet subnet is /29) IPPorts 1,3 ARP 44.124.1.17 x.x.x.147 3 D route 44.124.1.16/29 44.124.1.17 ; AMPRnet routes. route addprivate 44.124.1.16/29 encap 70.167.209.246 ; Arizona routes route addprivate 44.124.9.0/24 encap 65.49.149.125 route addprivate 44.124.7.0/25 encap 174.74.248.93 route addprivate 44.124.10/30 encap 50.116.8.127 route addprivate 44.124.1.8/29 encap 107.2.6.33 Thank you for your time, Christopher Kelley KG7UJH

4 10

Recap (incl video!) from Feb. 06 Meeting
by Rosy Wolfe 19 Feb '21

19 Feb '21

Hello 44net, Please find a recap of our Feb. 06 meeting here: https://www.ampr.org/feb-06-community-meeting-recap-2020-annual-report-new-… Thank you for your patience - it's been a busy couple of weeks. One thing that's happened is that we've been getting our new TAC and GAC up to speed. Read about the new committee members in the link above! Have a great weekend, Rosy -- Rosy Wolfe - KJ7RYV Executive Director Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC) ampr.org

1 0

Greetings and http vs https
by traderbeckola＠tahoma.com 17 Feb '21

17 Feb '21

Hello! I am new to 44net and AMPR. As I am learning about the AMPR system and setting up a gateway, I have been working through the ampr.org website and found that a lot of internal links are broken, as they reference http://... , but the links have been converted to https://. Anyone else having the same issue? 73's Erik, N7FYO

2 3

Updated Granting Goals
by Rosy Wolfe 11 Feb '21

11 Feb '21

Hello 44net, I'm pleased to share that ARDC has updated our granting goals for 2021. You can see them posted here: https://www.ampr.org/grantmaking-categories-requirements-goals/ The changes were made following feedback that the previous version was a bit confusing (including feedback from last year's 44net survey). This version breaks things down a bit more simply, into 3 high-level categories: * Support and Growth of Amateur Radio, * Education, and * Technical Innovation. Technical Innovation applies to the following areas: * Amateur Radio Technology & Experimentation, * Internet Technologies, * Digital Communications, and * Communication Science & Technology If you are interested in applying for a grant, please take a look at this new language. On a related note, we're looking forward to putting resources and effort into improving the Portal in 2021. I'll have more to share at our upcoming community meeting on Saturday 06 Feb. Learn more and sign up here: https://www.ampr.org/feb-6-meeting-sign-up/ Like last time, we'll share a report following the meeting for folks who can't attend, along with supplemental materials, including our first-ever annual report. More soon! Best wishes and 73, Rosy -- Rosy Wolfe - KJ7RYV Executive Director Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC) ampr.org

2 2

Contact request
by G1FEF 08 Feb '21

08 Feb '21

Hi, Does anyone know Ryan, K0RET and can get a message to him please? Ryan, if you are reading this, please could you drop me an email? Thank you, Chris - G1FEF

1 0

Feb. 6 Community Meeting + New Survey
by Rosy Wolfe 06 Feb '21

06 Feb '21

Hello, 44net! It's 2021, and things are already getting off to a running start at ARDC. We've got a big year of grantmaking and 44net portal work in store for the year, with additional members being added to our Grants Advisory Committee (GAC) and a new Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) being created to support both efforts. We'll have more to share about it soon, and we'd love to tell you about it at our next **community meeting**: * Saturday, 06 Feb 2021 * 18:00 GMT (10am PT / 1pm ET / 7pm CET) Join us by signing up here: https://www.ampr.org/feb-6-meeting-sign-up/ In this meeting, we'll cover: * Highlights from 2020, * Grantmaking goals in 2021, * Introductions of new Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and Grants Advisory Committee (GAC) Members, * Survey results from our latest survey, discussed below, and * Questions from our attendees. This meeting will be similar to the one we held on 10 Oct. 2020: https://www.ampr.org/recap-ardc-44net-oct-10-community-call/ This one is intended for a much broader audience. So - please tell your friends! We also plan to record this meeting for those who can't make it. ## New Survey Leading up to the meeting, we're also asking amateur radio enthusiasts to give us their thoughts in this survey: https://survey.alchemer.com/s3/6096699/ARDC-Amateur-Radio-Survey Please share it with other hams you know. As with the last survey, the aim is to get to know the people we aim to support through our grantmaking. And like our upcoming meeting, it too is meant for a broader audience. That's all for now! Looking forward to sharing more with everyone soon. All the best, Rosy -- Rosy Wolfe - KJ7RYV Executive Director Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC) ampr.org

1 1

BGP et al
by Colin Bodor 05 Feb '21

05 Feb '21

Hello, with all the talk of BGP on the list I thought I would drop a note. I am also part of another volunteer effort for those of you already doing your own BGP. Project TON, its sort of like a RBL but via BGP www.projectton.com<http://www.projectton.com> you can setup a peering, and block bad actors (mostly SSH scans currently but our mix is always growing) or even do blocking by prefixes based on country. All free of course - and currently experimental so YMMV, we are just trying to contribute to the community and make the internet "safer". If anyone also had any questions about BGP stuff in Western Canada (Calgary), I could help with that as well - its my day job. My thanks to everyone dedicating their time to this effort. -C/VA6CCB

1 0

Portal user name
by Tracy Markham 01 Feb '21

01 Feb '21

I forgot my portal login info ... entered my email address into the password reset and got the link, but it is asking to confirm my email address by entering my username - holy bazoombas I must have forgotten that one as well ... How to find your username? Years ago I deleted the welcome email ... Thanks Tracy N4LGH

2 1

Re: [44net] Concerning over undocumented BGP announcements
by Nat Morris 31 Jan '21

31 Jan '21

On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 2:55 PM G1FEF <chris(a)g1fef.co.uk> wrote: > > > > On 31 Jan 2021, at 14:09, Nat Morris <nat(a)nuqe.net> wrote: > > > > Which blocks did you report? > > I don’t really want to go into specific details on an open mailing list. Suffice to say that keeping an eye on these and responding to problems keeps me busy enough! Why not? what is to hide? hijack discussions happen on other mailing lists in the public. So no more comment from yourself as the BGP co-ordinator on the prefixes in the report? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nb4cTYVG1tm4HpxgPp7TAcgZ_qOlcej1whd… If you really do have the details on all these prefixes, there should be no reason you can't provide a statement on each, if it is an expected announcement, misconfiguration or hijackk Without you being slightly more forthcoming in public, in my eyes it puts the whole integrity of co-ordinating AMPRnet BGP announcements in doubt. > > Any explanation for these prefixes announced in the UK by AS61337, > > along side your portal prefixes, they are not documented at all in the > > portal: > > Not all allocations appear in the public listing on the portal, for various reasons. Try the Whois server if you want by check specific prefixes. Where is this publicly documented? > > RADB is ok, but not sufficient for the future. A better investment > > would be for the ARDC to negotiation with one of the 5 RIRs for > > prefixes to be registered there, so we could all benefit from use of > > their RPKI trust anchors. > > I can’t see that happening anytime soon I’m afraid, if ever, unless they drastically change their terms. We won’t do anything that risks losing our legacy status. Have the ARDC approached each RIR and discussed this? > > Having prefixes in RADB will not provide > > trust anchor functionality. > > Agreed, and RPKI is something we understand is desirable, there are several ways it could be achieved and will be the focus for the TAC at some point in the future. > > >> Which repo is this development taking place in? > > The development is taking place currently and will be open sourced when it’s ready. In the meantime, if you want to have input on any features you would like to see, feel free to contact Rosy and/or myself. I'd like to see planning for this taking place in the open, not closed. > > I noticed the github.com AMPRnet Portal repo has been removed. > > There was no point in it being there, we tried that route a couple of years ago and didn’t get anywhere. Nat, -- Nat https://nat.ms +44 7531 750292

4 4

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

44net