Re: [44net] A new era of IPv4 Allocations : Agree

Making 2 sandbox to play with is not limiting the choice, it is creating choice. Right now there are no choice or almost no choice. First choice connect with ipip tunnel to the ampr ipip mesh network. Be isolated on a high latency network with a high level of difficulty that the average ham have difficulty to connect to. and it is an outdated solution to say the least. Second choice connect to the internet, have VPS or server in a datacenter that can advertise by bgp your /24 at a minium and then with a vpn or other tunneling methode bring back those advertise ip address to your device or computer. Again, a pretty heavy task to do for the lambda ham. the entry level is steap to say the least. Next choice, IF you are are lucky someone have already done the heavy lifting and a RF link is possible for you to connect to net 44. but you dont know if that net will let anyone on the internet reach you and if you can connect to ham only content or provide ham only content securely and in concordence with your country law. That's it. not a lot of choice, lot of maybe, lots of complication. The TAC proposition is doing a simple thing. Provide 2 sand box. one where ham's and the rest of the world can interact with each other in a very simple thight utilisation of the address space to limit the route number and have a low latency for everyone. That would be 44.0/10 Next sand box is a place where ham's intercat with ham's , they all get to build their own little sand castle just as they like, again with an easy to program routing system low level of entry for beginner and the best, a low latency. now I am talking about 44.128/10 And to do such thing there would be a need for some pop's all over the globe to handle idying and intenal/external routing table for all pop connected networks. The pop's would do all the heavy lifting to have simple networkconfiguration AND assurance of source of traffic. This would really help people in country that have strict laws for relaying traffic and other such limitation. This would also help in creating and developping RF network for occupation and utilisation of our microwaves bands. And this would bring ham digital radio communication into the 21 first century. Pierre VE2PF ________________________________________ De : 44Net <44net-bounces+petem001=hotmail.com(a)mailman.ampr.org> de la part de Rob PE1CHL via 44Net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> Envoyé : 11 août 2021 10:05 À : 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org Cc : Rob PE1CHL Objet : Re: [44net] A new era of IPv4 Allocations : Agree On 8/11/21 3:23 PM, Toussaint OTTAVI via 44Net wrote: I think ARDC can offer end-user PoP access to their backbone themselves, and regional groups can always decide to setup their own access which connects to such a PoP and allows their own end-users to connect. The reason I think it would be best to support both these models is: - some countries already have the infrastructure to connect end-users and to route their traffic, no need to de-comission that and have people migrate - some countries have no access points and no active local teams wanting to setup such things, and they can connect directly to an ARDC PoP. Some users also may not think their local access point is reliable enough and want to connect to an ARDC PoP or even more than one. It should always be possible to have multiple options, we should not wire the possibilities into the network design. Rob _________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net