Brian,
I've been trying to follow these discussions, but am not sure I understand
how it should work.
Should I be able to send encapsulated traffic for a BGP connected 44 address
to
amprgw.sysnet.ucsd.edu and have it de-capulated (if that is a word!) and
sent over the Internet to the target host?
Would return packets follow the normal gating rules, and only be
encapsulated and send over a tunnel to me if my address is in the DNS? Or
would having sent a packet somehow enable a reverse path without a DNS
Entry?
If I have to have a DNS entry for this to work, would it be possible for you
to add a DNS entry for 44.131.56.7 host
nottm.g8bpq.ampr.org so I can
continue testing?
Thanks,
John G8BPQ
-----Original Message-----
From: 44Net [mailto:44net-bounces+john.wiseman=cantab.net@hamradio.ucsd.edu]
On Behalf Of Brian Kantor
Sent: 07 August 2015 00:38
To: AMPRNet working group
Subject: Re: [44net] New Linux Boot Scripts for Testing
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Testing shows that traffic between encap'd and BGP'd subnets of
network 44 is now possible. There was a bug in the ipfw rules
that fed the encapsulator that has been corrected and it seems
to work now.
- Brian
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net