6 Aug
2013
6 Aug
'13
7:57 p.m.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Marc, LX1DUC <lx1duc(a)rlx.lu> wrote:
But but... that does not work.
I tested it, and Brian confirmed that amprgw can not route packets out
to the Internet to the BGP 44/8 sites, unless those sites are also
reachable via an IPIP mesh. The technical reason is that the first
upstream router between amprgw and the Internet has a static 44/8
route towards amprgw, and does not have the full Internet BGP table
which would contain more specific routes to the BGP-only sites.
The BGP-enabled sites currently need to be present also in the IPIP
table, and have (at least) an IPIP decapsulation gateway, so that
other regular gateways can transmit packets to them. amprgw currently
cannot act as a relay.
Also, it's more optimal to transmit the packets directly using a
tunnel instead of trying to route via amprgw, even if it worked.
- Hessu
I've seen
this claim several times, but I don't understand why exactly
such a route would be necessary. Could you elaborate a bit?
Some networks are not routed via the IPIP full mesh but directly via the
Internet. For example Sweden and Australia announce their network directly
via BGP but at the same time it seems that they don't have IPIP full mesh
access.
As such if you want to reach any of those networks from within the IPIP full
mesh, you will need to route your packets via a default route for 44/8 to
the UCSD router which can then route the packets towards the internet.