Re: [44net] DNS cleanup

There is actually nothing wrong with choosing the portal info as reference data. Let me motivate: Amprgw DNS entries are only relevant for connected subnets. There is no public accessible tunnelled 44 network without having a portal entry. If there is no such entry, the tunnels would not work. BGP announced 44 subnets are well known, and can be easily excepted from the delete process. All other existing dns entries associated with a 44 address, if they exist, will be not be impacted in any way, since they are isolated, and the dns services at amprgw are not used by them. Marius, YO2LOJ -----Original Message----- From: Brian Kantor Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2016 18:11 To: AMPRNet working group Subject: Re: [44net] DNS cleanup (Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________ On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 08:16:51AM +0100, Rob Janssen wrote: What would you have me do? It's clear that the majority of the entries in the DNS are bogus. We have NOTHING to reference except the portal data. Doesn't it make sense to try to get that data in order? - Brian _________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net