25 Apr
2014
25 Apr
'14
5:11 p.m.
+1
I have just joined the list and received my new 44 ip again, about 17 years
I left my old one.
We can not define our network having to trust ISP to announce parts of the
44 network for free.
I think that most we could do may be asking universities and so to route
those kind of 44 address blocks, maybe per country (or bigger blocks if
possible)... and then try to route the traffic tunneling (GRE probed to be
a good solution some years ago with the open wireless free network
projects) or via radio if the distance allow us to do it.
Of course, asking one individual to arrange with his DSL provider one /32
or a /24 announced ... is not realistic. At least in Spain, EA.
Jaime, EA4TV
El 25/04/2014 17:09, "Neil Johnson" <neil.johnson(a)erudicon.com> escribió:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Why all this talk about BGP? Real men and women network engineers
should use IS-IS :-)
Seriously though, I agree with those who are on the side of making
44-net MORE accessible and beneficial to average Amateur Radio
Operators. Requiring CCNA/CCIE level networking knowledge is not the
way to go. The IP-IP/RIP44 tunnel system is complicated enough, but at
least it can be done with easily available hardware and Linux. I also
agree that most ISP's are not going to want to advertise chunks of
44-net without someone paying for it.
I would like to see a backup to the UCSD gateway, but understand that
would be complicated for a variety of reasons.
-Neil
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Neil Johnson <neil.johnson(a)erudicon.com>
wrote:
The University of Iowa being one of them
(128.255.0.0/16) :-). It's
where I work.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Dean Gibson AE7Q <ampr(a)ae7q.com> wrote:
--
Neil Johnson
http://erudicon.com
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
On 2014-04-24 23:35, YT9TP Pedja wrote:
--
Neil Johnson
http://erudicon.com
...
Actually there is a big difference. Within 44.x.x.x you have safe IP
addressing. It is impossible to have address conflicts with any other
network if you interconnect.
This reminds me of a company I worked for many years ago, which chose
128.x.x.x as its internal IP address space.
Yes, there were certain external sites they could not visit.
Yes, they went out of business (in 2002).
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net