Re: [44net] Help setting up a BSD-based gateway?

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Dan Cross <crossd(a)gmail.com> wrote: Folks, I just wanted to do a quick followup to this for the archives. I am now successfully transferring traffic between my 44net subnet (44.44.107.0/24) and the rest of the world using my OpenBSD-based router. A quick recap of my setup: 1. I have a Comcast business class circuit. 2. I have a dedicated static IP address to use as an endpoint for 44net traffic. 3. My comcast router is just a router; no NATing, no firewalling. 4. My (non-comcast) edge router is a Ubiquiti EdgeRouter Lite running OpenBSD 5.9. It has three ethernet interfaces: a. cnmac0 is the external interface connected to Comcast's network b. cnmac1 connects to my internal network c. cnmac2 is my internal gateway to 44.44.107.0/24. On OpenBSD, tunneling interfaces for IPENCAP are provided by 'gif' pseudo-devices. Unlike Linux, it appears that one creates a separate 'gif' interface for each tunnel, but one seems able to create an arbitrary number of such interfaces: I created a thousand as a test. I'm sure there is a limit but it seems sufficiently high that practically routing AMPRNet traffic won't run up against it. (Again, if someone knows of a different way to configure a single 'gif' interface so that it could support multiple tunnels, I'd be happy to know about it). In other words, don't worry about scalability because you are creating a separate 'gif' interface for each tunnel to another AMPRNet site. On AMPRNet, the UCSD gateway *will not* pass traffic for an IP address that does not have a corresponding entry in the AMPR.ORG domain. Also, 44.0.0.1 does not respond to 'ping' from 44/8 IP's. Caveat emptor as one tries to test: make sure you have DNS entries for your addresses and try pinging something other than 44.0.0.1 or you'll suffer contusions banging your head against a desk trying to figure out why nothing appears to work.... Once I had a tunnel up to UCSD, I found that I could ping my 44.44.107.1 machine from a host on my internal network, but not from arbitrary machines. This was interesting; it turns out that hosts on my internal network get NAT'ed to another IP address on the small subnet I got from Comcast (through another, completely separate router -- not comcast's router but another ERL). What was happening was that as I ping'ed 44.44.107.1 from e.g. my laptop, ICMP echo request packets got NAT'ed to this other address and routed over to amprgw.sysnet.ucsd.edu and tunneled back to the external interface of my AMPRNet gateway. The gateway accepted the encapsulated ICMP echo requests (I have a PF rule that explicitly allows ping) and forwarded them across the tunnel interface where they were unencapsulated; the IP stack saw that the result was addressed to an IP address on a local interface (i.e., they were for the router) and generated an ICMP echo response packet with a *source* address of 44.44.107.1 and a *destination* address of the external address of my other router (that is, the address the ICMP echo request was NAT'ed to). This matched the network route for my local Comcats subnet and so my AMPRNet router realized it could pass the packet back to my other router directly. It did so and the other router happily took the packet, matched it back through the NAT back to the original requesting machine (my laptop) and forwarded it: hence, I got my ping responses back. But note that the response was not going through the tunnel back to UCSD: it was being routed directly through the external interface. Now consider what happens when I tried to ping 44.44.107.1 from a different machine on some other network. The ICMP echo request packet gets routed through the UCSD gateway and tunneled back to my gateway as before, but since responses don't go through back through the tunnel, the response packet matches the default route of my gateway and get's forwarded to comcast's router. Comcast would look at it, see that 44.44.107.1 wasn't on one of it's known networks that it would route floor, and discard the response. Oops. The solution was to set up a separate routing table in a different routing domain specifically for AMPRNet traffic, and tie the two together using firewall rules. In the AMPRNet routing table, I could set my default route to point to the UCSD gateway, so any traffic sent from one of my 44.44.107.0/24 addresses that doesn't match a route to a known tunnel gets forwarded through amprgw.sysnet.ucsd.edu. With that in place, I could ping my gateway from random machines. This must seem obvious to a lot of folks here, but it took me a little while to figure out what was going on. Things are working now, however. So far I have encountered two other caveats: I decided to configure two tunnel interfaces statically at boot time: 'gif0' goes to the UCSD tunnel, and 'gif1' sets up a tunnel to N1URO for his 44.88 net. Under OpenBSD, I assumed that the natural way to do this would be to add /etc/hostname.gif0 and /etc/hostname.gif1 files and this does in fact create the tunnels at boot time. However, traffic going out from my gateway doesn't seem to get sent through the tunnels; I did not bother to track down exactly why, but I believe it has to do with some kind of implicit ordering dependency when initializing PF. When I set up the separate routing domain, it struck me that the language accepted by /etc/netstart in an /etc/hostname.if file was not sufficiently rich to set up tunnels in a routing domain, so I capitulated and just set up the static interfaces from /etc/rc.local; imperfect but it works. The second caveat is that I seem to have tickled a kernel error trying to set up an alias of a second IP address on my 44.44.107.1 NIC; I get a kernel panic due to an assertion failure. It looks a bug to me, but I haven't had the bandwidth to track it down. In the meanwhile, simply don't add aliases to interfaces in non-default routing domains. I'll try to go through my notes and type up something for the wiki. The next step is to write a modified version of rip44d for BSD. I may take a stab at that this weekend if I can get some time. As near as I can tell, the wire format of the protocol is strictly RIPv2; the difference is what the gateway does with the data in the RIP packet (it sets up tunnels in addition to maintaining routes). Anyway, I hope this can be of some small help to someone else who wants to run an OpenBSD-based gateway! - Dan C.