Re: [44net] Testers/Consideration/Inquiry - Coordinating the Private AS Numbers

All, Thanks! *Ronen, "Im not a Network guru (although i worked at ISP 20 years ago But forgot most of the knowledge)... I tend to agree that currently when i now go to any Israeli commercial site from the 44 net ip the packet travel to UCSD and then back to UCSD and by tunnel to me again and this is a long trip...the only thing I can think off is to put a secondary portal for redundancy. Im willing to cooperate..." "If i do NAT I loose the ability the gain acess the 44 Net Hosts from commercial IP..." I agree! Let' s also agree on a...(Ethernet?) tunnel...and establish BGP initallty discuss concept and to test... - a few days after this Holy season. In theory (or my RIP44v2 and testing considerations), you should not need to NAT, we would use another protocol (lower priority, etc.) to route. Therefore, if you have connectivity, you would operate multihomed. When a packets enters a node vias IPIP or tome other tunnel via fail over/receivig route announcements. *Assi, "Im willing to cooperate There is a mechanism, it's the point to point tunnels. Most gateways support that..." Some 'RIP44v2'??? using another port? Another method? *Rob, "Please note you will have a constant traffic of several Mbit/s from only the bad guys that are portscanning and the reflection from the bad guys using your addresses as spoofed source address, and this is increasing all the time. So don't do this from your home, put your router in a datacenter where you have 100 Mbit/s or more." Agreed! Marius, "...There is really no need to access commercial sites using a 44net addresses via the US." Agreed. Thanks, KB3VWG