Subject:
Re: [44net] 44.151.29.29/32 F4LTS
From:
"Marc, LX1DUC" <lx1duc(a)laru.lu>
Date:
02/25/2015 08:25 PM
To:
44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>I would be happy to scrap the Portal and go
back to the procmail
>scripts that Jim Fuller developed and operated for decades.
>Things worked, and worked dependably, back then!!
>
>The Portal is way too "vaccuumous" for me:(
>
>--- Jay WB8TKL
Hello Jay,
I assume that like any development project, Jim's solution didn't work
100% from the beginning either. Cut the developers of the portal some
slack and report your issues here, so the issues become known and can
be fixed (or someone may provide a workaround).
Anyway the thanks to all the developers on the project!
73 de Marc
I agree with that in principle, but I have reported several issues and rarely ever was
anything
changed to solve those issues, while in the meantime things were changed that caused
even more issues (like the mandatory selection of a registered subnet for an IPIP
tunnel),
or that added features that were not near the top of any wishlist observed here (like an
API).
What I need in my daily work as a coordinator in a network that has been springing into
life
again is a usable mechanism for address assignment, and a way to edit an existing
structure
into the new database. Without those present, I have to work around the system and tell
people to ignore features and make requests in a separate mail.
That would be fine if there would be visible progress, say a new feature every month or
two,
but I have a hard time seeing any.
Rob