24 Jul
2013
24 Jul
'13
7:12 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 25/07/2013 00:33, Michael E. Fox - N6MEF wrote:
I hope not. It's missing the tunnel between local
gateway 1 and
local gateway 2. It would be impractical to bounce all traffic
through some 3rd location.
You're assuming both Local gateways are able to participate directly
in the IPIP fullmesh.
If Local Gateway 1 does support the fullmesh but Local Gateway 2 does
not, then the traffic will have to go over some upstream gateway.
If both Local Gateways do support the IPIP fullmesh, they will of
course be able to exchange traffic directly.
73 de Marc, LX1DUC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=y5qs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----