4 Dec
2021
4 Dec
'21
12:47 p.m.
In the US if it is OTA ham then it would require published key, if it is on
the internet it would be up to ampr, if ampr is saying up to the operator
and that seems lodgical to me.
Lin NI4Y
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 4:15 PM Rob PE1CHL via 44Net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
wrote:
On 12/3/21 8:22 PM, Kevin Walsh via 44Net wrote:
--
Lin Holcomb
Office: +1 404 806 5412
Mobile: +1 404 933 1595
Fax: +1 404 348 4250
It would be most helpful if the amprnet BOD could
post in writing an
official statement regarding using common secure communications (https.
TLS
etc.) over the 44. IP network.
Why? That
would be a matter for each individual operator to decide, based
on
their local laws and regulations, and the extend to which those are
enforced in practice.
I don't see a need for any centralized statement about that, especially as
this is
a worldwide network and regulations of all participating countries, as
well as the
technologies used in the network, can impossibly be overseen by the ARDC.
Rob
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net