Re: [44net] Making Packet Node with Pi ?

+1 On 16-03-04 08:16 PM, kd6oat wrote: > (Please trim inclusions from previous messages) > _______________________________________________ > Regarding an STA for higher data rates experimentation: I would think a > well written proposal accompanied by the signature of a number of licensed > operators willing to participate in experiments would go a long way. Count > me in as one who would be willing to sign on. > Ken - KD6OAT > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Brian Kantor <Brian(a)ucsd.edu> wrote: > >> (Please trim inclusions from previous messages) >> _______________________________________________ >> In the FCC arena, one of the better ways to get technical restrictions >> removed is to apply for and operate under an STA - Special Temporary >> Authority, a document from the FCC that basically allows you to operate >> an exception to the normal rules. Typically the only requirement is >> that you make a good case for it technically and that you write up a >> report afterwards. In the past, STAs have been the basis for changes to >> the rules. Someone who writes well may want to consider submitting one to >> allow higher data rates based solely on bandwidth and then experimenting >> with it. >> >> Another possibility is to apply for a Experimental Radio Service license >> which basically allows you to do just about anything if you can make a >> good case for it. They used to be a little expensive and they require >> a written report on what you found out with your experiments but it does >> allow nearly anything you can think of. >> - Brian >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 07:42:09PM +0200, Demetre - SV1UY wrote: >>> Not good for US though, "thanks" to FCC's 300baud symbol rate >> restrictions of HF. >> _________________________________________ >> 44Net mailing list >> 44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu >> http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net >> >