11 Jun
2012
11 Jun
'12
12:45 a.m.
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 02:52:55 +0300, "Marius Petrescu"
<marius(a)yo2loj.ro> wrote:
No spoofing. Just plain and simple NAT to your public
IP.
If you are using NAT you don't need a 44.x.x.x address. In that case
there is no difference between hiding a 44net address and a 10net
address behind the NAT.
The whole point of this discussion, as I understand it, is how to
implement peering between AMPRNET and other autonomous systems on the
net. This would allow routing of 44net addresses without need for NAT
or tunneling.
The difficulty lies in getting ISPs to allow "ordinary users" to
maintain 44net IP addresses or networks and advertise routes from
within that ISP.