Re: [44net] 44net is not just for tunneling

It seems as if I misinterpreted your earlier message summarizing the offline discussions Brian. Splitting up the address space by delegations of smaller chunks to commercial service providers with different AS-numbers and policies will lead to a historical mistake. Is that what you propose in your latest message ? or am I missing something now? The way to create the trust and support for a radio amateur policy is to keep it together by keeping the delegations inside the community under an amprnet as-number facilitating multi-homing without tunnels connecting the delegations to the outside world anywhere via peering and transit agreements and keeping the challenge of internal connectivity between delegations as the driver of innovation that will take radio amateurism to the next level. Managing interdomain peering and transit via bgp, announcing delegated pieces of the 44/8 via different border routers is not difficult and can be done with low cost solutions and open source routing software, much cheaper than most rigs. In what way will the ham community benefit from splitting up the resource? In no way that I can see, but there is a lot to loose. Bjorn On 2012-06-05 20:20, Brian Kantor wrote: