6 Sep
2013
6 Sep
'13
7:33 p.m.
BGP would not typically be run on individual LANs and most certainly would
not be run on anything less than a /24.
It is part of an architected network
Internet <----> Router running BGP for 44.XX.xx.xx/16 <-- VPN / Tunnel /
RF ---> Local LANS (/25 ---> /32)
The BGP enabled router would typically be installed at a data center / ISP
/ University / Agency that has an agreement to do BGP broadcasts to their
upstream provider.
LANs and Individual stations would route any 44.x.x.x sourced traffic
through the BGP enabled router, which would put it on the Internet.
------------------------------
John D. Hays
K7VE
PO Box 1223, Edmonds, WA 98020-1223
<http://k7ve.org/blog> <http://twitter.com/#!/john_hays>
<http://www.facebook.com/john.d.hays>
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Assi Friedman <assi(a)kiloxray.com> wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
So how are people dealing with running BGP over home class internet
service?
With ISPs becoming more and more restrictive, I can't see any ISP in the US
allowing this. While not 100% sure, I believe running BGP would be in
violation of the garden variety usage agreement that is tailored towards
"home use" and prohibits any service that falls into the business class
traffic. Also, how does BGP interoperate with the current default route of
non 44 op to mirrorshades? Did Brian remove any BGP advertised subdomain
from the default route?
Assi KK7KX/4X1KX
(www.kiloxray.com)
-----Original Message-----
I don't agree with that.
People who want to experiment with BGP are free and welcome to do
that, but there is no and there should not be any "deprecating IPIP
tunnels".
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
http://www.ampr.org/donate.html