From the description of your use case it seems that you
will not have to do any modifications if this proposal is approved. If you want to use
this address space with BGP in the future (or through the PoPs), we can look at it at the
time, as I don’t know in which state everything will be by then.
So the answer is “No, you won’t have to do any modifications”.
Antonis
On 28 Jul 2021, at 19:14, Pedro Converso
<pconver(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for answering Antonis, but I don't quite understand.
Argentina has many hundreds of 44.153.x.x hams your can see on
http://amsat.org.ar/amprhost.txt
Many of these users have 44.153 gateways portal registrered, installed
and operational thru ip encap, with tcpip services protocols and aprs
radio and/or over internet using Rasbperries, Linux PCs or routers.
As for now no BGP are in use, that doesn't mean BGP won't be used in the future.
This network has been in succesful operation since the eighties, and
keeps on growing.
Question again is, this proposed change will afect or impair our
operation ?. Please be specific as yes or no.
Thanks,
73, lu7abf, Pedro
44.153 Coordinator