Frank,
I work in IT professionally, and really the holdup is that IPv6 "is hard." Not
that it's actually hard. I run IPv6 both professionally and personally, but it does
take some effort to implement, it's dealt with somewhat differently than IPv4, and in
some cases, could require new equipment to be able to handle it.
Additionally, we have somewhat of a chicken and the egg problem. Major hosting providers
aren't terribly inclined to go through all the above effort because very few consumers
actually have v6 connectivity. And on the other side, many consumer ISPs haven't put
much effort into getting their customers v6 connectivity due to few major hosting
providers or web sites actually support it.
Comcast has been for once doing something laudable, and has been pushing IPv6 deployment
throughout their networks, and while it's not everywhere yet, they (as of the end of
last year) had 25% of their quite substantial customer base enabled for IPv6 use.
Hopefully, the rest of the industry will follow suit and we'll see IPv6 adoption pick
up significant steam, both amongst hosting providers, as well as consumer ISPs.
Nigel
K7NVH
On Apr 3, 2014, at 10:48 AM, sp2lob(a)tlen.pl wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Hello Frank,
Amazingly simple and clear, Hi!
Best regards.
Tom - sp2lob
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net