30 Jul
2021
30 Jul
'21
5:04 a.m.
44.128/10 CANNOT talk to 44.0/10. 44.128/10 is, in
their vision, a completely separate network, which can only be reached via RF. And to
communicate with 44.128/10 you would need a new subnet within 44.128/10 ON TOP of your
44.0/10 subnet. So this makes routing in "home routers" (of which most ISP
routers/modems cannot add any kind of static routes) more complex as you'll have 2
static routes to take care of and monitor.
This is the one part of the proposal I don't understand. Why not separate the two, but
still allow those with BGP setups to announce any or all of 44.128/10 to the Internet, so
that the RF network is globally routable, but without causing any probems for those with
basic routers.
Charlie