17 Jul
2013
17 Jul
'13
2:20 a.m.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 09:35:03PM +0300, Heikki Hannikainen wrote:
How about if someone sends an encapsulated 44-to-44
packet to amprgw, and the packet has a destination address in one of
the BGP subnets, and the subnet is not in encap database? Would that
get routed out from amprgw (unencapsulated), or would it be dropped?
It's supposed to get routed out unencapsulated. I haven't tested that
to make sure it works.
And wouldn't it be preferred to have that go
directly encapsulated to
an encap gateway box at the BGP-enabled site?
I think it should, for network efficiency and robustness. Perhaps we
should make that a required part of the network architecture?
- Brian