26 Aug
2013
26 Aug
'13
3:27 p.m.
Brian,
My munge script adds a route command to 169.228.66.251 as a last line.
It does not look right to me but if you say it does not matter then it
is OK by me.
Is everyone else using a munge script? if yes could someone publish it
here so that I can compare it with the one I use! Maybe I use an
outdated one here.
73 de SV1UY
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Brian Kantor <Brian(a)ucsd.edu> wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
--
73 de SV1UY
Demetre Ch. Valaris
e-mail: demetre.sv1uy(a)gmail.com
Radio e-mail: sv1uy(a)winlink.org
(to use my radio e-mail put //WL2K in the beginning of the subject line)
http://www.qsl.net/sv1uy
Destination Gateway Genmask
Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
44.0.0.0 169.228.66.251 255.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 tunl0
I think you probably shouldn't have this route as amprgw (169.228.66.251) isn't
really
a default route for the rest of AMPRNet -- there isn't one. AMPRNet is fully
routed by the entries in the encap table and any subnet which isn't in the table
is by definition not reachable. But I don't think it'll do any harm.
- Brian
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
http://www.ampr.org/donate.html