BGP is what is used at a high level for the internet, it can be ultra-reliable but of
course only as reliable as the number of peers and the admin who runs that ASN 😉 and in
some cases, the politics of the country you reside in.
I have no comment on the proposal, other than that if I need to renumber any of my BGP
prefixes, sooner is probably better than later, and VPN makes more sense (I think that’s
whats being proposed?) than the current method (but BGP is best) IMHO. Amazon AWS for
example can do BGP through a VPN, those of us who can do BGP will prefer it as its easiest
for our network design, and if you "just want to connect" IPSEC is supported by
almost everything and would be easy to configure and setup, specially with a portal to
create credentials and provide some config examples. Then just default route through it.
Or even OpenSSL... The renumbering is what it is.
I am also willing to provide some no charge VPS's up here in Canada if that is of any
use for VPN end points or whatever purpose. We are actively seeking volunteer
opportunities that "mesh" with our IT offerings (data center, BGP, VPS etc) and
happy to donate some resources to a good cause. I also focus on keeping local traffic
local (IE internet exchange points) so if the opportunity is there to help route local
44net traffic within Canada that’s great, and better for a number of reasons.
Just my .02
-Colin/VA6CCB
-----Original Message-----
From: 44Net <44net-bounces+colin.bodor=imperium.ca(a)mailman.ampr.org> On Behalf Of
Pedro Converso via 44Net
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 12:06
To: 44Net general discussion <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
Cc: Pedro Converso <pconver(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [44net] A new era of IPv4 Allocations
Thanks Antonis,
Looks things could be then allright for us in case this proposal is accepted.
Althoug BGP doesn't look reliable as on
https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/security/glossary/what-is-bgp/ I try to not favore BGP
usage for ampr users.
73, lu7abf, Pedro
On 7/28/21, Antonios Chariton (daknob) via 44Net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
Hello Pedro,
The 44.153/16 allocation will only be affected if you do not want to
join a network like HAMNET but instead you want to use this IP space
on the Internet using BGP.
Depending on your current use case and what you plan to do, we can
provide more information about any steps you may have to take, and if
you do, we’ll be happy to work with you to determine what these may be.
Thanks,
Antonis
On 28 Jul 2021, at 15:59, Pedro Converso via
44Net
<44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
Will proposed change affect 44.153.x.x allocations?
Thanks
73, lu7abf, Pedro
44.153 Argentina Coordination
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net