On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Michael E Fox - N6MEF <n6mef(a)mefox.org>wrote;wrote:
This plan would create intermediaries such that an outage WOULD impact
tunnel traffic and we're at the mercy of whoever pushes his way into being
that middle man. No thank you.
You are making a big leap here. Nobody is going to tell you who you are
going to have for neighbors or up stream. Find someone you trust, that has
the contingency plan you feel comfortable with and connect to them. They
don't even have to be in your neighborhood.
Any plan will have the potential for failures. You might control your IPIP
tunnel but what if your ISP goes away? Is the device that is running your
tunnel on redundant power? Does it have redundant networking with failover
and portability of your encapsulating IP address? Does very end point you
want to talk to have those capabilities?
At my day job, every dollar that comes into our company arrives on an
RJ-45, and it falls into my area of responsibility to make sure it stays up
and we have failover and contingency plans. I understand these things. (I
use geographically dispersed data centers, multiple carriers, redundant
servers, etc. but there is still the potential to go down, at least
temporarily, even even with service level agreements.)
I also understand that ham radio is a hobby..
------------------------------
John D. Hays
K7VE
PO Box 1223, Edmonds, WA 98020-1223
<http://k7ve.org/blog> <http://twitter.com/#!/john_hays>
<http://www.facebook.com/john.d.hays>