16 Jul
2013
16 Jul
'13
3:08 p.m.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:59:10PM +0300, Heikki Hannikainen wrote:
Tested, does not work:
Seems to be a routing loop somewhere over there,
137.110.222.1
probably routes all of 44/8 to amprgw (maybe it has a static route for
44/8 and does not have the full BGP routing table with more specific
routes announced elsewhere) and amprgw then gives packet destined to
44.74.128.25 back to 137.110.222.1 since it's not in the encap routing
table.
That is precisely what's happening. 137.110.222.1 is an internal router
with no BGP so it'll never learn about those directly-connected subnets.
- Brian