15 Aug
2016
15 Aug
'16
4:14 a.m.
It's frustrating when one has deployed IPv6 and
has to keep battling
with the evils of NAT. :/
But we have a large IPv4 space available so why would we battle with NAT???
It should not be a problem to get an IPv4 address from net-44 for any of your
experiments and not have to use NAT.
Not that I am against experimenting with IPv6, but I am not sure which way
that should go:
- somehow get an "own" IPv6 range that we can manage in a similar way as
the net-44 space
- just use the IPv6 space everyone can get from their local provider and
have only DNS support for it in ampr.org and maybe some service for listing
of prefixes in use on ampr hosts to be used in firewall address lists.
Having an own range appears nice, but it means we will again have the problems with
internet tunneling and BGP routing that we are having now.
Rob