26 Nov
2013
26 Nov
'13
9:16 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11/26/13 6:46 PM, Marc, LX1DUC wrote:
On 27/11/2013 00:12, Bryan Fields wrote:
Who says this should be? I can't find anything in the TOS or documents on
ampr.org saying this is a requirement.
I don't agree with this (for CIDR blocks), there are valid reasons to have
forward and reverse matching DNS. If we had SWIP/rwhois working we could do
this ourselves.
Perhaps we need to put an APMRnet use case RFC together, but I'd rather have
policy reached by a consensus if we're going to have non Internet standard
requirements.
Thoughts?
- --
Bryan Fields
727-409-1194 - Voice
727-214-2508 - Fax
http://bryanfields.net
> In my example, how can I get
254.98.44.in-addr pointed at my DNS
> servers? I don't see an ability to do this via the portal page.
You just
don't. All revDNS for the AMPR/44net addresses end in
ampr.org. I don't see aproblem with that. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSlVXzAAoJEGWJwvsug9rS1KsIANZydzWyFWg6n1VCKaKrzo2A
cZLpKhWgimDSjeT+bFX7GnbEWNSZ1peX5p+OQzrCGXqTxD3hDIiCrSB05UZp0p6c
9NhxFH9BtSNlgaVdkV6k9sbcPkY7wieYB9l0AWSgQMnKOJHbWM/6Vu4ndFbJwqig
8diMiIQgbV4Yz1isHGkiVsDsC+qhKAQJUXH3kKCThUSMK3o7ANZk5X2BEU2F94D2
9Q9ai/TNx7cr7YXlYFRiLa7xTR/ExeQEZDzNOSl2Sx1N0YvB9qkdAVEfb1Jf/XB+
ijMFVMMMVISGy5bRUgYXHWLCDvbPJusmUi+JC76lwZWN6qREidQItecavt6ENGQ=
=aqgE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----