I can also help in this endeavor if required, but I think the /20 should be a bit split
into two parts (2 x /21) for example, just to be more specific (in getting the point
across). :-)
On 16 Jul 2019, at 19:11, Adam Korab
<ak(a)mid.net> wrote:
On Jul 16, 2019, at 11:00 AM, Job Snijders
<job(a)ntt.net> wrote:
To completely cover the 44net block from a BGP perspective, in addition
to the existing 44.0.0.0/9 and 44.128.0.0/10 announcement, 44.192.0.0/10
should also be announced (and nullrouted) from some vantage point.
I'm happy to do so if the community accepts my help in this regard. I
have facilities to announce the prefix and ignore any traffic received
for it.
If this is decided to be a good idea, I can help too - I also have facilities and and
submit the routes as a customer route to 3356 and 174 (and 2914 but I expect Job has this
well covered <g>) which might help from a “customer routes” vs. “peer routes”
perspective.
Adam
K0RAB
BGP Enthusiast ;-)
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net