17 Aug
2013
17 Aug
'13
10:46 p.m.
Aha!!
That's what I needed to get this going via my pFsense box. Protocol was
IPENCAP and not IPIP. Shouldda thought of that.
Thanks!
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Brian Kantor <Brian(a)ucsd.edu> wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 08:02:46PM -0700, David Ranch wrote:
Just to confirm, if protocol 4 is the only one in
use, then the
output of N1URO's script needs to be updated a bit?
Yes, that is correct, there is no need for iptables to pass proto 94.
Proto 94 is deprecated and no one should be using it for anything.
I don't think there's any harm in letting it through but strictly
speaking we probably shouldn't.
- Brian
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
http://www.ampr.org/donate.html