Chris, I am replying to the group although my question will not be of interest to many
others, apologies to most of you!
I have been silently following the discussions but too shy to ask, until now, what is
happening in the UK? I have been out of the hobby for some years but may get back in
(retirement pending) ... we had a few active stations in the Cambridgeshire area but when
interest dropped the regional rep closed his gateway down of course. I would assume that
management of the DNS for our entries would have delegated back upwards but I am not sure
who to. I think the addresses we used were in the 44.131.29.0/24 range, from memory. It
would be nice to think that we could just switch on again one day and carry on using those
addresses but if there's a shortage of addresses in that range then I suppose that we
should release them; however I suspect that isn't the case locally!
Do you know what the delegation chain (if I can call it that) is, down to our
range/subnet?
As an observation, the allocation system we had seemed to be a little like a manual,
heirarchical version of DHCP, with addresses allocated as needed by local agents who
updated the DNS for you and in turn made requests for required subnet address ranges to
agents higher up the chain. This thought makes me wonder if something like DHCP/DDNS might
have a role in managing DNS in Amprnet?
Sorry to clutter the list,
73
--
Steve Platt, G4WSZ