26 Aug
2021
26 Aug
'21
3:41 a.m.
On 26 Aug 2021, at 08:34, Rob PE1CHL via 44Net
<44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
On 8/26/21 9:20 AM, Chris Smith via 44Net wrote:
That has always been the case, as was handed down to me by Brian. In any case, we have
never used RFC2317 delegation as Nick asked about, not for any connection method, we’ve
only ever delegated /24 (or larger) prefixes for BGP announced subnets.
Chris
To answer your question: no, we don’t delegate
DNS for IPIP mesh users, it is all handled centrally.
Is that a new policy? I think in the past there was no relation between DNS
delegation and
the connection method? Rob
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net