28 Sep
2022
28 Sep
'22
4:48 p.m.
Yes, some cable and DSL modems can be flashed with did-wrt or even openwrt, but before you
try, check to see if your provider will allow it. I’m in Canada and even if I own the
modem, they will not support it. It will essentially brick the modem because the providers
use a proprietary version of the software and it’s not possible to reinstall it once
changed. You end up having to buy a new modem.
I’m not trying to scare you off doing this. Just make sure first. A simple phone call to
the providers tech support.
Roger
VA7LBB
On Sep 28, 2022, at 13:42, Boudewijn (Bob) Tenty via
44net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
Yes, it will work if dd-wrt is available for the chip-set in it, so you have to flash
it with the right version.
It is the first thing I do if I receive such a modem, re-flash it with dd-wrt if that is
not in it. There is
a good change that nowadays dd-wrt is already in it with new modems. At least, that is
what I see here.
Bob
On 2022-09-28 16:08, Lee D Bengston wrote:
Not sure if that will work if the router is also
a cable-modem or DSL-modem.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022, 2:49 PM Boudewijn (Bob) Tenty via 44net
<44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
> Just flash your router with dd-wrt if it can't pass ipip and the problem is
solved.
>
> Bob
>
>
> On 2022-09-28 14:33, Rob PE1CHL via 44net wrote:
> > There is nothing special to do, except that you need to make sure that incoming
protocol-4
> > traffic on your internet connection arrives at your gateway system. And with
modern internet
> > routers as supplied by providers that is often impossible. You often can
forward TCP and UDP
> > ports only, not protocols. And when there is a "DMZ" setting that
promises to forward all
> > unsolicited incoming traffic to a specified host, more and more often it handles
only TCP and UDP
> > traffic.
> > It can be deceiving that the router often passes replies to outgoing protocol-4
traffic as part
> > of its standard NAT function. That is not enough. It needs to pass unsolicited
incoming traffic
> > or else you will not see the RIP packets.
> >
> > Rob
> >
> > On 9/28/22 20:24, David Ranch via 44net wrote:
> >> Hey Chris, Marius,
> >>
> >> Ok, thank you for the correction though I clearly remember that
"something" additional was required before RIP updates would start flowing over
the IPIP tunnel other than the user just defining their gateway IP address for the IPIP
tunnel endpoint. What is "that".
> >>
> >> --David
> >> KI6ZHD
> > _______________________________________________
> > 44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org
>
> --
> There is nothing permanent except change
> -Heraclitus
>
> _______________________________________________
> 44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org
--
There is nothing permanent except change
-Heraclitus
_______________________________________________
44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org