Subject:
Re: [44net] Bad MX records in the
ampr.org DNS
From:
Tom Hayward <esarfl(a)gmail.com>
Date:
06/02/2015 10:01 PM
To:
AMPRNet working group <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
> I'm not sure if this is how everyone does it, but we (HamWAN) had to
> make DNS changes via our regional coordinator. We would construct an
> email in AMPR DNS robot format and send it to him, then he would
> forward it to the robot. This added quite a bit of latency (half day
> plus) to our updates and quite a workload for our regional coordinator
> (our network is growing fast).
I think when you are responsible for some subnet and you have frequent updates,
it would be trivial to get you registered as submitter of updates to the DNS robot.
Also, there should be DNS update functionality in the portal and it should be possible
to be a regional coordinator there, so you can approve the updates for your network.
However, that function is still not completed.
I think that when problems are encountered, solutions should be sought that result
in a clear and workable solution for everyone, not a fork of the main system. Effort
spent on running a DNS for a subdomain had better been spent on a usable update
mechanism for the main DNS.
Rob