Is there any plans for creating IRR route objects in
ARIN in the future?
ARIN does not run an RPSL-style database (unless that's changed
recently) so has no concept of a "route object" the way that you are
thinking of it.
Some large providers operate their own RPSL-style database that they use
to build policy for their routers out of. That makes quite a lot of
sense once your network is big enough that you can't just use a text
file, and it doesn't rely on anyone external to operate your database
for you. You are free to have your own view of the world.
It's a very different culture than what we have in RIPE-land. I agree
with John that this lack of centralisation made possible, the
proliferation of the Internet early on.
Nowadays, in normal circumstances, we're not so much concerned with the
proliferation of the Internet, in many places it's saturated. The
industry has consolidated itself to a large extent.
However, in disaster or crisis situations, you need agility. Sometimes
you have to do things that were not forseen when the centralised
synoptic view of the world was created. Especially for amateur radio
operations it is crucially important not to hem ourselves in when we are
needed most.
This means not documenting ourselves in databases in an inflexible way
that will be believed over the reality on the ground and restrict our
ability to work. Speaking from personal experience in disasters and
crises, it can cost lives.
There is also the RADB which attempt({s?,ed?}) to be a place where
people can publish their route objects and intended policies. Nobody
trusts it because anybody can put anything in it and corrections are
handled reactively after the fact.
Best,
-w