Thomas et al;
On Wed, 2019-03-13 at 16:44 +0100, Thomas Osterried wrote:
<$0.02>
Again about
AX25 packages AX.25 Apps, AX.25 Tools, AX.25 Library: It is
always the best choise to recompile and use VE7FET packages (thanks to Lee
VE7FET for bugs fixed and reorganizing) instead of official repository
(APT) ?
It's always the best choice to use the official repo. See
http://www.linux-ax25.org/wiki/GIT
http://www.linux-ax25.org/wiki/Compilation
Debian has dropped some of the packages from your group because when it
does come to patches, politics wins over technical issues with the
maintainer upstreams and deploying known broken packages does NO ONE any
good, nor does it help the growth of the hobby using ax.25/netrom/rose.
It's a
pity that there is no way to have a single good source ...
It would always have been a good idea to send patches upstream.
This is not true. I know those who's submitted patches and they get
rejected 100% with non-technical reasonings such as not knowing rose or
it wasn't developed within the maintainer group. This is not a secret,
many know this which is why there's multiple distributions of the exact
same packages out there.
Discussions on this are quite old as I'm sure David Ranch will agree.
Until the maintainers of the original packages begin to accept patches
sent, they could make .diff files themselves from the other releases,
test, and incorporate them for better improved "original" release.
Ever since kernel 4.2, the whole ax.25 suite is of no value whatsoever
and now people are going round robin blaming others rather than fixing
things. Marius made a patch as well, which appears to be working on his
site but I do not know if he submitted it to the maintainers. With the
history of rejections of patches I wouldn't be surprised if he hasn't.
</$0.02>
--
I won't be like a Texas official and call Ocasio-Cortez a bimbo
but she does think Roe vs Wade are two different ways to cross a river.
-----
73 de Brian N1URO
IPv6 Certified
n1uro-dawt-ampr-dawt-org
uronode-dawt-n1uro-dawt-com