On 2.8.2013 0:46, Marc, LX1DUC wrote:
The most efficient way is probably the way the RIRs
have been handling
out allocation in the last couple of years. It's probably just easier
to determinate the network size and assign the first available network
of that size. Eventually you could temporarily reserve the adjacent
network of the same size so that the network could be extended to that
size if necessary. An example:
44.a.0.0/27 for user A
44.a.0.32/27 reserved for user A extension or until exhaustion of the
44.a.0.0/16 block
44.a.0.64/27 for user B
44.a.0.92/27 reserved for user B or until exhaustion
44.a.0.128/26 for user C
44.a.0.192/26 reserved for user C
etc
etc
Once you have filled all of 44.a.0.0/16 you can start allocating the
reserved blocks. However if in the meantime user B needs more
addresses, you can extend his allocation from 44.a.0.64/27 to
44.a.0.64/26. The renumbering is pretty easy in that case, a change if
netmask is all that is required (in this example). OTOH there is no
link between a physical LAN and the addressing, a physical LAN might
be using 2 or more subnets (44.a.0.64/26 and 44.a.0.192/26) for
addressing.
I noticed that in AMPR this is the way IP allocation is handled and I
totally support it. I do it the same way in other network.
I think this is the best approach when you are dealing with subnetting
and you do not know how usage will expand.
Pedja YT9TP