27 Jul
2014
27 Jul
'14
8:44 p.m.
Dutch IP space would be fine too (: That said I'm up for whatever I
can just simply get working until I can find better. What would be
ideal here would be for somewhere between each /16 and each /24 for
instance to have a bgp announced vlan server that accepted a variety
of vlan and tunnel types (GRE, PPTP, L2TP, OpenVPN,
LibreSwan/StrongSwan). maybe as a group we could head that way. I'd
be up for leading an effort to get something us based going. In the
US at least the layout of IP space poses a bit of an issue though as
a /16 is a bit more regionalized than would be desired for something
starting at the national level which would be easiest or even breaking
things into say east and west.
Eric
AF6EP
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Rob Janssen <pe1chl(a)amsat.org> wrote:
> (Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
> _______________________________________________
> 44net-request(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu wrote:
>>
>> Subject:
>> Re: [44net] 44Net Digest, Vol 3, Issue 117
>> From:
>> Eric Fort <eric.fort(a)gmail.com>
>> Date:
>> 07/27/2014 06:49 AM
>>
>> To:
>> AMPRNet working group <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
>>
>>
>> Rob,
>>
>> for the specific situation I'm in we ought chat. I do eventually want
>> to set up my own 44net vpn hub.... but for the moment it would work
>> just fine to have an ip out of finland or elsewhere. now if someone
>> wanted to setup a vpn server host for various yet to be routed subnets
>> that would be even cooler..... but yes, let's chat. a vpn connection
>> to you would be most welcome.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Eric
>
> Eric,
>
> My VPN server is only configured for Dutch IP adresses, as I have configured
> it in such a
> way that it can use existing allocated net-44 addresses, for which I am the
> coordinator for
> 44.137.0.0/16, and I am setting up a server for this network to be announced
> on BGP.
> That is not finished (waiting for permission from the ISP and then from
> ARDC), but it
> already operates as a gateway. On that machine I installed the OpenVPN
> server.
> So it only works for existing adresses in the 44.137.0.0/16 network, that
> are not within
> a subnet registered at the portal.
>
> However, others have taken a different approach, they allocate new addresses
> from a
> special subnet. I think the Finnish server does this as well.
>
> Best would be if someone nearer to you provides this service, as this yields
> much better
> performance.
>
> Rob
>