17 Apr
2014
17 Apr
'14
4:38 p.m.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Tom Hayward <esarfl(a)gmail.com> wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Marius Petrescu <marius(a)yo2loj.ro> wrote:
One problem that comes to mind is SSL wouldn't be allowed on 44net unless
everyone has the private key and I doubt ARRL will release that.
In his application, I don't see a problem with source address
authentication or pseudo passwords. Honestly, I wouldn't even bother with
authentication. If someone is going to use it for nefarious purposes then
they're already committed to impersonating me and my callsign. After all,
there's nothing physically stopping me from impersonating you on the air...
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Time and again there appear suggestions for using that LOTW certificate
for other
things then LOTW.
I don't know if you are aware, but not
everyone is an ARRL member or
uses LOTW.
So, as long as things like APRS have absolutely
nothing to do with ARRL,
please keep them apart.
I assume that since all you mentioned in your reply was disdain for
ARRL, that is the only piece of this scheme you don't like?