4 Dec
2021
4 Dec
'21
3:10 a.m.
The BoD are not lawyers and ARDC's purpose doesn't include commenting on
encryption under part 97. I suggest you contact a telecom lawyer or try
reaching out to the lawyers at ARRL.
Tim
On 12/3/21 11:22 AM, Kevin Walsh via 44Net wrote:
It would be most helpful if the amprnet BOD could post
in writing an
official statement regarding using common secure communications (https. TLS
etc.) over the 44. IP network.
This email list is used for communications regarding the use of the IP
address space. I'm not asking about the use of encryption over part 97 RF
radio, just the 44 network IP address space. I am not aware of any portion
of the Part 97 rules that apply to the wired internet at large.
Everyone has an opinion, but it's time for the amprnet Board to clarify the
muddy waters around the use of the amprnet IP space and publish those rules.
Please!
73,
Kevin Walsh
W8KHW
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net