22 Feb
2012
22 Feb
'12
5:19 p.m.
On 2/22/2012 3:08 PM, Brian Kantor wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:33:32AM +0200, Marius
Petrescu wrote:
Dan K6DLC says his
assignment of these addresses to me was in error, new
addresses are in 44.4.9, new gateway entry in the works.
I am puzzled that we want to assign 44-net addresses one by one as shown
in amprhosts rather than as subnets. Perhaps there is a historical
reason for that. The routing table could get to be very large (we can hope!)
73 de David WA6NMF
Should be either 44.9.0.1/255.255.255.255 or
44.9.0.0/255.255.255.252
44.9 is an invalid subnet.